ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2021
Recent Advances and Perspectives in Lithium-Sulfur Pouch Cells.
Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Polysulfide Immobilization and Sulfur Conversion Kinetics Promotion via a Tetrathiafulvalene-Crown Ether COF@Graphene Layer for High-Rate Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Article
- Practical Lithium-Sulfur Batteries: An Integrated Design Roadmap from High-Loading Cathodes to High-Energy Pouch Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Electrochemical Performance of Deposited LiPON Film/Lithium Electrode in Lithium-Sulfur Batteries.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Synthesis of Solketal Catalyzed by Acid-Modified Pyrolytic Carbon Black from Waste Tires.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Adsorption of lithium ions from aqueous solution by magnetic aluminum-based adsorbents.PloS one · 2023Article
- Hierarchical Porous and Three-Dimensional MXene/SiOMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Lithium-sulfur batteries (LSBs) are considered one of the most promising candidates for next-generation energy storage owing to their large energy capacity. Tremendous effort has been devoted to overcoming the inherent problems of LSBs to facilitate their commercialization, such as polysulfide shuttling and dendritic lithium growth. Pouch cells present additional challenges for LSBs as they require greater electrode active material utilization, a lower electrolyte-sulfur ratio, and more mechanically robust electrode architectures to ensure long-term cycling stability. In this review, the critical challenges facing practical Li-S pouch cells that dictate their energy density and long-term cyclability are summarized. Strategies and perspectives for every major pouch cell component-cathode/anode active materials and electrode construction, separator design, and electrolyte-are discussed with emphasis placed on approaches aimed at improving the reversible electrochemical conversion of sulfur and lithium anode protection for high-energy Li-S pouch cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.