Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34770686›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Towards a Mobile Gait Analysis for Patients with a Spinal Cord Injury: A Robust Algorithm Validated for Slow Walking Speeds.

Charlotte Werner, Chris Awai Easthope, Armin Curt, László Demkó

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gait analysis methods in people with spinal cord injury: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gait Variability at Different Walking Speeds.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Charlotte WernerSpinal Cord Injury Research Center, University Hospital Balgrist, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3070-6445
Chris Awai EasthopeCereneo Foundation, Center for Interdisciplinary Research (CEFIR), 6354 Vitznau, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3602-7841
Armin CurtSpinal Cord Injury Research Center, University Hospital Balgrist, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.
László DemkóSpinal Cord Injury Research Center, University Hospital Balgrist, 8008 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5677-2331
Universitätsklinik Balgrist · CHCereneo · CHETH Zurich · CH

Funding

International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia P183Swiss State Secretariat for Education 15.0255Wings for Life Spinal Cord Research Foundation WFL-CH-21/17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) patients suffer from diverse gait deficits depending on the severity of their injury. Gait assessments can objectively track the progress during rehabilitation and support clinical decision making, but a comprehensive gait analysis requires far more complex setups and time-consuming protocols that are not feasible in the daily clinical routine. As using inertial sensors for mobile gait analysis has started to gain ground, this work aimed to develop a sensor-based gait analysis for the specific population of SCI patients that measures the spatio-temporal parameters of typical gait laboratories for day-to-day clinical applications. The proposed algorithm uses shank-mounted inertial sensors and personalized thresholds to detect steps and gait events according to the individual gait profiles. The method was validated in nine SCI patients and 17 healthy controls walking on an instrumented treadmill while wearing reflective markers for motion capture used as a gold standard. The sensor-based algorithm (i) performed similarly well for the two cohorts and (ii) is robust enough to cover the diverse gait deficits of SCI patients, from slow (0.3 m/s) to preferred walking speeds.

Indexed as

Gait AnalysisSpinal Cord InjuriesAlgorithmsGaitHumansWalkingWalking Speedclinical assessmente-healthgait analysisIMUinertial sensorsrehabilitationspinal cord injurywearables

Identifiers

PMID34770686
PMCPMC8587087
OpenAlexW3213695286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.