Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34770651›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Optical Fiber Sensors for Ultrasonic Structural Health Monitoring: A Review.

Rohan Soman, Junghyun Wee, Kara Peters

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rohan SomanInstitute of Fluid Flow Machinery, Polish Academy of Science, 80-231 Gdansk, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5499-2565
Junghyun WeeDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2731-2795
Kara PetersDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1945-7196

Funding

National Science Center 2019/33/B/ST8/01699Office of Naval Research N00014-14-1-0652Office of Naval Research N00014-17-1-2764Office of Naval Research N00014-18-1-2240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guided waves (GW) and acoustic emission (AE) -based structural health monitoring (SHM) have widespread applications in structures, as the monitoring of an entire structure is possible with a limited number of sensors. Optical fiber-based sensors offer several advantages, such as their low weight, small size, ability to be embedded, and immunity to electro-magnetic interference. Therefore, they have long been regarded as an ideal sensing solution for SHM. In this review, the different optical fiber technologies used for ultrasonic sensing are discussed in detail. Special attention has been given to the new developments in the use of FBG sensors for ultrasonic measurements, as they are the most promising and widely used of the sensors. The paper highlights the physics of the wave coupling to the optical fiber and explains the different phenomena such as directional sensitivity and directional coupling of the wave. Applications of the different sensors in real SHM applications have also been discussed. Finally, the review identifies the encouraging trends and future areas where the field is expected to develop.

Indexed as

Optical FibersUltrasonicsFiber Optic Technologyacoustic emissionfiber optic sensorsguided wavesstructural health monitoringultrasonic

Identifiers

PMID34770651
PMCPMC8587794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.