Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34770644›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Time Latency-Centric Signal Processing: A Perspective of Smart Manufacturing.

Sharifu Ura, Angkush Kumar Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sharifu UraDivision of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Kitami Institute of Technology, 165 Koen-cho, Kitami 090-8507, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-4584-5288
Angkush Kumar GhoshGraduate School of Engineering, Kitami Institute of Technology, 165 Koen-cho, Kitami 090-8507, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9644-177X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smart manufacturing employs embedded systems such as CNC machine tools, programable logic controllers, automated guided vehicles, robots, digital measuring instruments, cyber-physical systems, and digital twins. These systems collectively perform high-level cognitive tasks (monitoring, understanding, deciding, and adapting) by making sense of sensor signals. When sensor signals are exchanged through the abovementioned embedded systems, a phenomenon called time latency or delay occurs. As a result, the signal at its origin (e.g., machine tools) and signal received at the receiver end (e.g., digital twin) differ. The time and frequency domain-based conventional signal processing cannot adequately address the delay-centric issues. Instead, these issues can be addressed by the delay domain, as suggested in the literature. Based on this consideration, this study first processes arbitrary signals in time, frequency, and delay domains and elucidates the significance of delay domain over time and frequency domains. Afterward, real-life signals collected while machining different materials are analyzed using frequency and delay domains to reconfirm its (the delay domain's) significance in real-life settings. In both cases, it is found that the delay domain is more informative and reliable than the time and frequency domains when the delay is unavoidable. Moreover, the delay domain can act as a signature of a machining situation, distinguishing it (the situation) from others. Therefore, computational arrangements enabling delay domain-based signal processing must be enacted to effectively functionalize the smart manufacturing-centric embedded systems.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-Assisteddelay domainlow data acquisitionsensor signalssmart manufacturingtime latency

Identifiers

PMID34770644
PMCPMC8587126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.