Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34770639›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Time Series Segmentation Based on Stationarity Analysis to Improve New Samples Prediction.

Ricardo Petri Silva, Bruno Bogaz Zarpelão, Alberto Cano, Sylvio Barbon Junior

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ricardo Petri SilvaDepartment of Electrical Engineering, State University of Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8538-5346
Bruno Bogaz ZarpelãoDepartment of Computer Science, State University of Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9172-3578
Alberto CanoDepartment of Computer Science, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23284, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9027-298X
Sylvio Barbon JuniorDepartment of Computer Science, State University of Londrina, Londrina 86057-970, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4988-0702

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A wide range of applications based on sequential data, named time series, have become increasingly popular in recent years, mainly those based on the Internet of Things (IoT). Several different machine learning algorithms exploit the patterns extracted from sequential data to support multiple tasks. However, this data can suffer from unreliable readings that can lead to low accuracy models due to the low-quality training sets available. Detecting the change point between high representative segments is an important ally to find and thread biased subsequences. By constructing a framework based on the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) test for data stationarity, two proposals to automatically segment subsequences in a time series were developed. The former proposal, called Change Detector segmentation, relies on change detection methods of data stream mining. The latter, called ADF-based segmentation, is constructed on a new change detector derived from the ADF test only. Experiments over real-file IoT databases and benchmarks showed the improvement provided by our proposals for prediction tasks with traditional Autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and Deep Learning (Long short-term memory and Temporal Convolutional Networks) methods. Results obtained by the Long short-term memory predictive model reduced the relative prediction error from 1 to 0.67, compared to time series without segmentation.

Indexed as

Machine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsDatabases, FactualData Miningsize reduction in time seriesstationarity analysistime series prediction improvementtime series segmentation

Identifiers

PMID34770639
PMCPMC8587387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.