Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34770556›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Applicability of Physiological Monitoring Systems within Occupational Groups: A Systematic Review.

Denisse Bustos, Joana C Guedes, João Santos Baptista, Mário P Vaz, José Torres Costa, Ricardo J Fernandes

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A Classification Method for Workers' Physical Risk.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessing the Impact of Work Activities on the Physiological Load in a Sample of Loggers in Sicily (Italy).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Denisse BustosAssociated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics, LAETA (PROA), Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-4942-7625
Joana C GuedesAssociated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics, LAETA (PROA), Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-2367-2187
João Santos BaptistaAssociated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics, LAETA (PROA), Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8524-5503
Mário P VazAssociated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics, LAETA (PROA), Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-6347-9608
José Torres CostaAssociated Laboratory for Energy, Transports and Aeronautics, LAETA (PROA), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal.
Ricardo J FernandesPorto Biomechanics Laboratory, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5811-0443
Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

Doctoral Program in Occupational Safety and Health of the University of Porto demsso.ldb.PD9986Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia PCIF/SSO/0063/2018Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/143608/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of physiological monitoring technologies has produced exceptional opportunities for real-time collection and analysis of workers' physiological information. To benefit from these safety and health prognostic opportunities, research efforts have explored the applicability of these devices to control workers' wellbeing levels during occupational activities. A systematic review is proposed to summarise up-to-date progress in applying physiological monitoring systems for occupational groups. Adhering with the PRISMA Statement, five databases were searched from 2014 to 2021, and 12 keywords were combined, concluding with the selection of 38 articles. Sources of risk of bias were assessed regarding randomisation procedures, selective outcome reporting and generalisability of results. Assessment procedures involving non-invasive methods applied with health and safety-related goals were filtered. Working-age participants from homogeneous occupational groups were selected, with these groups primarily including firefighters and construction workers. Research objectives were mainly directed to assess heat stress and physiological workload demands. Heart rate related variables, thermal responses and motion tracking through accelerometry were the most common approaches. Overall, wearable sensors proved to be valid tools for assessing physiological status in working environments. Future research should focus on conducting sensor fusion assessments, engaging wearables in real-time evaluation methods and giving continuous feedback to workers and practitioners.

Indexed as

Heat Stress DisordersAccelerometryHeart RateHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicWorkplacecardiac reactivityfatigueheat stressoccupational activitiesoccupational physiologyperformancephysical activity patternsphysical exertionwearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID34770556
PMCPMC8587311
OpenAlexW3209148789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.