Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34770552›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

Automated Assessment of the Quality of Phonocardographic Recordings through Signal-to-Noise Ratio for Home Monitoring Applications.

Noemi Giordano, Samanta Rosati, Marco Knaflitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Prototype design and realization of a portable heart sounds detection system.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Noemi GiordanoDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunications and PoliToBIOMedLab, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9265-6538
Samanta RosatiDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunications and PoliToBIOMedLab, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0620-594X
Marco KnaflitzDepartment of Electronics and Telecommunications and PoliToBIOMedLab, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5396-5103

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The signal quality limits the applicability of phonocardiography at the patients' domicile. This work proposes the signal-to-noise ratio of the recorded signal as its main quality metrics. Moreover, we define the minimum acceptable values of the signal-to-noise ratio that warrantee an accuracy of the derived parameters acceptable in clinics. We considered 25 original heart sounds recordings, which we corrupted by adding noise to decrease their signal-to-noise ratio. We found that a signal-to-noise ratio equal to or higher than 14 dB warrants an uncertainty of the estimate of the valve closure latencies below 1 ms. This accuracy is higher than that required by most clinical applications. We validated the proposed method against a public database, obtaining results comparable to those obtained on our sample population. In conclusion, we defined (a) the signal-to-noise ratio of the phonocardiographic signal as the preferred metric to evaluate its quality and (b) the minimum values of the signal-to-noise ratio required to obtain an uncertainty of the latency of heart sound components compatible with clinical applications. We believe these results are crucial for the development of home monitoring systems aimed at preventing acute episodes of heart failure and that can be safely operated by naïve users.

Indexed as

Heart SoundsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumansPhonocardiographySignal-To-Noise Ratioautomated quality assessmentheart failureheart valve timingphonocardiographysignal-to-noise ratiotelemonitoring

Identifiers

PMID34770552
PMCPMC8588421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.