Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34770373›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2021

2D Quantitative Imaging of Magnetic Nanoparticles by an AC Biosusceptometry Based Scanning Approach and Inverse Problem.

Gabriel Gustavo de Albuquerque Biasotti, Andre Gonçalves Próspero, Marcelo Dante Tacconi Alvarez, Maik Liebl, Leonardo Antonio Pinto, Guilherme Augusto Soares, Andris Figueiroa Bakuzis, Oswaldo Baffa, Frank Wiekhorst, José Ricardo de Arruda Miranda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gabriel Gustavo de Albuquerque BiasottiBiosciences Institute of Botucatu, São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18618-689, São Paulo, Brazil.
Andre Gonçalves PrósperoBiosciences Institute of Botucatu, São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18618-689, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcelo Dante Tacconi AlvarezBiosciences Institute of Botucatu, São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18618-689, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maik LieblPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Abbestraße 2-12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4545-3006
Leonardo Antonio PintoBiosciences Institute of Botucatu, São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18618-689, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6037-6064
Guilherme Augusto SoaresBiosciences Institute of Botucatu, São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18618-689, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4723-466X
Andris Figueiroa BakuzisInstitute of Physics, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia 74690-900, Brazil.
Oswaldo BaffaFaculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters at Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-900, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0622-2814
Frank WiekhorstPhysikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Abbestraße 2-12, D-10587 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0608-1473
José Ricardo de Arruda MirandaBiosciences Institute of Botucatu, São Paulo State University, Botucatu 18618-689, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KO5321/3Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft TR408/11German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) - PROBAL 888 81.198748/2018-01German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) - PROBAL 88887.198747/2018-00National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 304107-2019-0São Paulo Research Foundation 2013/07699-0The European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research 16NRM04 "MagNaStand"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) in biomedical applications requires the quantitative knowledge of their quantitative distribution within the body. AC Biosusceptometry (ACB) is a biomagnetic technique recently employed to detect MNPs in vivo by measuring the MNPs response when exposed to an alternate magnetic field. The ACB technique presents some interesting characteristics: non-invasiveness, low operational cost, high portability, and no need for magnetic shielding. ACB conventional methods until now provided only qualitative information about the MNPs' mapping in small animals. We present a theoretical model and experimentally demonstrate the feasibility of ACB reconstructing 2D quantitative images of MNPs' distributions. We employed an ACB single-channel scanning approach, measuring at 361 sensor positions, to reconstruct MNPs' spatial distributions. For this, we established a discrete forward problem and solved the ACB system's inverse problem. Thus, we were able to determine the positions and quantities of MNPs in a field of view of 5×5×1 cm3 with good precision and accuracy. The results show the ACB system's capabilities to reconstruct the quantitative spatial distribution of MNPs with a spatial resolution better than 1 cm, and a sensitivity of 1.17 mg of MNPs fixed in gypsum. These results show the system's potential for biomedical application of MNPs in several studies, for example, electrochemical-functionalized MNPs for cancer cell targeting, quantitative sensing, and possibly in vivo imaging.

Indexed as

Magnetite NanoparticlesAnimalsDiagnostic ImagingMagnetic FieldsMagneticsRadionuclide ImagingMagnetite NanoparticlesAC Biosusceptometryinverse problemmagnetic nanoparticlesquantitative imaging

Identifiers

PMID34770373
PMCPMC8587841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.