Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34770141›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

How to Make the Hospital an Option Again: Midwives' and Obstetricians' Experiences with a Designated Clinic for Women Who Request Different Care than Recommended in the Guidelines.

Floor Opdam, Jeroen van Dillen, Marieke de Vries, Martine Hollander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Negotiating Awareness: Dutch Midwives' Experiences of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Counseling.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Characteristics of Homebirth in Hungary: A Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Floor OpdamDepartment of Midwifery, The University of Midwifery Education & Studies, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jeroen van DillenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marieke de VriesInstitute for Computing and Information Sciences, Radboud University, Toernooiveld 212, 6525 EC Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Martine HollanderDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn increasing number of maternity care providers encounter pregnant women who request less care than recommended. A designated outpatient clinic for women who request less care than recommended was set up in Nijmegen, the Netherlands. The clinic's aim is to ensure that women make well-informed choices and arrive at a care plan that is acceptable to all parties. The aim of this study is to make the clinic's approach explicit by examining care providers' experiences who work with or within the clinic.

methodsqualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with Dutch midwives (

resultsFour main themes were identified: (1) "Trusting mothers, childbirth and colleagues"; (2) "A supportive communication style"; (3) "Continuity of carer"; (4) "Willingness to reconsider responsibility and risk". One overarching theme emerged from the data, which was "Guaranteeing women's autonomy". Mutual trust is a prerequisite for a constructive dialogue about birth plans and can be built and maintained more easily when there is continuity of carer during pregnancy and birth. Discussing birth plans at the clinic was believed to be successful because the care providers listen to women, take them seriously, show empathy and respect their right to refuse care. A change in vision on responsibility and risk is needed to overcome barriers such as providers' fear of adverse outcomes. Taking a more flexible approach towards care outside the guidelines demands courage but is necessary to guarantee women's autonomy. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In order to fulfil women's needs and to prevent negative choices, care providers should care for women with trust, respect for autonomy, and provide freedom of choice and continuity. Care providers should reflect on and discuss why they are reluctant to support women's wishes that go against their personal values. The structured approach used at this clinic could be helpful to maternity care providers in other contexts, to make them feel less vulnerable when working outside the guidelines.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesMidwiferyAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleHospitalsHumansPregnancyQualitative Researchautonomycare outside the guidelineshigh riskhomebirthmaternity carepersonalised careshared decision makingThe Netherlandstreatment refusalwoman-centred care

Identifiers

PMID34770141
PMCPMC8583448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.