Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34770104›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Effect of Differing Durations of High-Intensity Intermittent Activity on Cognitive Function in Adolescents.

Lorna M Hatch, Karah J Dring, Ryan A Williams, Caroline Sunderland, Mary E Nevill, Simon B Cooper

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. What Types of Exercise Are Best for Emotional Intelligence and Logical Thinking?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorna M HatchDepartment of Sports Science, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0386-4926
Karah J DringDepartment of Sports Science, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.
Ryan A WilliamsDepartment of Sports Science, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.
Caroline SunderlandDepartment of Sports Science, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7484-1345
Mary E NevillDepartment of Sports Science, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.
Simon B CooperDepartment of Sports Science, School of Science and Technology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5219-5020
Nottingham Trent University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exercise duration may influence the acute effects on cognition. However, only one study to date has explored the dose-response relationship between exercise duration and cognition in adolescents. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of differing durations of high-intensity intermittent running on cognition in adolescents. Thirty-eight adolescents (23 girls) completed three trials separated by 7 d: 30 min exercise, 60 min exercise, and rest; in a randomised crossover design. The exercise was a modified version of the Loughborough Intermittent Shuttle Test (LIST), which elicited high-intensity intermittent exercise. Cognitive function tests (Stroop test, Sternberg paradigm, Flanker task) were completed 30 min pre, immediately post, and 45 min post exercise. Response times on the incongruent level of the Flanker task improved to a greater extent 45 min following the 30 min LIST, compared to rest (

Indexed as

CognitionRunningAdolescentExerciseFemaleHumansReaction TimeStroop Testadolescentsattentioncognitiondurationexercisehigh-intensityinhibitory controlphysical activityworking memory

Identifiers

PMID34770104
PMCPMC8583632
OpenAlexW3213580723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.