Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34770077›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Regulatory Resistance? Narratives and Uses of Evidence around "Black Market" Provision of Gambling during the British Gambling Act Review.

Heather Wardle, Gerda Reith, Fiona Dobbie, Angela Rintoul, Jeremy Shiffman

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Heather WardleSchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RT, UK.
Gerda ReithSchool of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6539-0295
Fiona DobbieUsher Institute, Old Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK.
Angela RintoulHealth Innovation and Transformation Centre, Federation University, Churchill, VIC 3842, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4159-8814
Jeremy ShiffmanBloomberg School of Public Health and School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Federation University · AUJohns Hopkins University · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S019200/1Wellcome Trust 200306/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Commercial gambling is increasingly viewed as being part of the unhealthy commodities industries, in which products contribute to preventable ill-health globally. Britain has one of the world's most liberal gambling markets, meaning that the regulatory changes there have implications for developments elsewhere. A review of the British Gambling Act 2005 is underway. This has generated a range of actions by the industry, including mobilising arguments around the threat of the "black market". We critically explore industry's framing of these issues as part of their strategy to resist regulatory change during the Gambling Act review. We used a predefined review protocol to explore industry narratives about the "black market" in media reports published between 8 December 2020 and 26 May 2021. Fifty-five articles were identified and reviewed, and themes were narratively synthesised to examine industry framing of the "black market". The black market was framed in terms of economic threat and loss, and a direct connection was made between its growth and increased regulation. The articles mainly presented gambling industry perspectives uncritically, citing industry-generated evidence (

Indexed as

GamblingHumansPolicyPublic Healthblack marketgamblingGambling Act reviewGreat Britainregulationunhealthy commodities

Identifiers

PMID34770077
PMCPMC8582964
OpenAlexW3208450971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.