Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34770041›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Reflections throughout the COVID-19 Lockdown: What Do I Need for Successful Learning of Engineering?

Víctor Revilla-Cuesta, Marta Skaf, Milagros Navarro-González, Vanesa Ortega-López

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Víctor Revilla-CuestaDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3337-6250
Marta SkafDepartment of Construction, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7205-2692
Milagros Navarro-GonzálezDepartment of Chemistry, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.
Vanesa Ortega-LópezDepartment of Civil Engineering, University of Burgos, 09001 Burgos, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The intention of this study was to identify the elements that engineering students consider fundamental for successful learning on engineering courses. The aim was to provide generic guidelines suitable for any engineering course with which the teaching may be adapted in the light of comments from students, while student learning improves. The abrupt transition from face-to-face to asynchronous online teaching due to the COVID-19 pandemic prompted reflection among students on both teaching methods. Students were invited to evaluate each method through a survey of open-ended questions, identifying useful elements for their learning. The survey was repeated over nine weeks, to obtain the views of students after they had accepted the change and had critically analyzed how to improve online teaching. A cross-coded qualitative and mixed (word counting) analysis showed that the explanation of engineering concepts should be organized, hierarchical, repetitive, and exemplified. Furthermore, the teacher should link all the activities and projects to the concepts explained and quickly solve any doubts that they raised. As a consequence of the online teaching resulting from COVID-19, the need of independent student learning and peer support was also very evident. Teaching functions are essential on engineering courses, as teachers have to explain the overall concepts carefully, identify the key concepts, and demonstrate their industrial and professional applications. Furthermore, teaching methodologies that balance these aspects with autonomy and peer support for learning on engineering courses should be promoted.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlEngineeringHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2autonomyCOVID-19 pandemicengineering courseface-to-face teachinghigher educationlockdownonline teachingpeer supportstudent perceptionuniversity

Identifiers

PMID34770041
PMCPMC8583235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.