Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34770000›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Australia's Disability Employment Services Program: Participant Perspectives on Factors Influencing Access to Work.

Alexandra Devine, Marissa Shields, Stefanie Dimov, Helen Dickinson, Cathy Vaughan, Rebecca Bentley, Anthony D LaMontagne, Anne Kavanagh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandra DevineMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7549-9876
Marissa ShieldsMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2392-616X
Stefanie DimovMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.
Helen DickinsonSchool of Business, University of New South Wales, Canberra 2610, Australia.
Cathy VaughanMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.
Rebecca BentleyMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.
Anthony D LaMontagneSchool of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, Melbourne 3125, Australia.
Anne KavanaghMelbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne 3010, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disability employment programs play a key role in supporting people with disability to overcome barriers to finding and maintaining work. Despite significant investment, ongoing reforms to Australia's Disability Employment Services (DES) are yet to lead to improved outcomes. This paper presents findings from the Improving Disability Employment Study (IDES): a two-wave survey of 197 DES participants that aims to understand their perspectives on factors that influence access to paid work. Analysis of employment status by type of barrier indicates many respondents experience multiple barriers across vocational (lack of qualifications), non-vocational (inaccessible transport) and structural (limited availability of jobs, insufficient resourcing) domains. The odds of gaining work decreased as the number of barriers across all domains increased with each unit of barrier reported (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07, 1.38). Unemployed respondents wanted more support from employment programs to navigate the welfare system and suggest suitable work, whereas employed respondents wanted support to maintain work, indicating the need to better tailor service provision according to the needs of job-seekers. Combined with our findings from the participant perspective, improving understanding of these relationships through in-depth analysis and reporting of DES program data would provide better evidence to support current DES reform and improve models of service delivery.

Indexed as

EmploymentPersons with DisabilitiesAustraliaHumansSurveys and Questionnairesdisability employment programsnon-vocational and structural barriers to workpaid employment for people with disabilityvocational

Identifiers

PMID34770000
PMCPMC8582653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.