Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34769996›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Determinants of Household Energy Choice for Cooking in Northern Sudan: A Multinomial Logit Estimation.

Philbert Mperejekumana, Huan Li, Rucong Wu, Jiaxin Lu, Obid Tursunov, Hussien Elshareef, Mohamed S Gaballah, Nsengiyumva Jean Nepo, Yuguang Zhou, Renjie Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Household fuel choices and consumption intensity in Pakistan: evidence from HIES data 2001-2019.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2023
    Article
  4. Solid Fuel Combustion and Air Pollution: Filling the Data Gap and Future Priorities.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Does Use of Solid Cooking Fuels Increase Family Medical Expenses in China?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Philbert MperejekumanaBioenergy and Environment Science & Technology Laboratory, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Huan LiBioenergy and Environment Science & Technology Laboratory, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Rucong WuBioenergy and Environment Science & Technology Laboratory, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Jiaxin LuSchool of Ecology and Environment, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048, China.
Obid TursunovDepartment of Power Supply and Renewable Energy Sources, Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers, Tashkent 100000, Uzbekistan.ORCID 0000-0003-2467-8900
Hussien ElshareefBioenergy and Environment Science & Technology Laboratory, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
Mohamed S GaballahNational Center for International Research of BioEnergy Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6064-5631
Nsengiyumva Jean NepoCollege of Agriculture Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, University of Rwanda, Kigali 4285, Rwanda.ORCID 0000-0002-0607-1825
Yuguang ZhouBioenergy and Environment Science & Technology Laboratory, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5345-3746
Renjie DongBioenergy and Environment Science & Technology Laboratory, College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional biomass utilization is connected with negative environmental and human health impacts. However, its transition to cleaner cooking fuels is still low where the household's fuels preferences play an important role in the process. To examine the factors that influence the household's cooking fuel choice in Northern Sudan, a multinomial logit model (MNL) was used to analyze data collected from Kassala state in two selected districts, New Halfa and Nahr Atabara. The findings show that the most utilized fuels are still firewood and charcoal, which are used by 63.4% of all respondents. The results also revealed that socioeconomic factors have an impact on household fuel choice, where one additional unit of credit access may boost the possibility of choosing LPG by 22.7%. Furthermore, one additional level of education would reduce 5.4% of charcoal users while simultaneously raising 10% of current liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) users. Therefore, the study suggests initiating mobilization and training programs to raise awareness and encourage the usage of cleaner fuels. This study will provide policymakers with information on household cooking energy utilization while designing and developing policies related to energy. It will also contribute to the expanding body of literature concerning the transition to clean cooking fuels from traditional biomass.

Indexed as

Air Pollution, IndoorPetroleumCookingFamily CharacteristicsHumansSudanPetroleumbiomasscooking fuelsfirewoodhousehold’s choicemultinomial logit modelpollution

Identifiers

PMID34769996
PMCPMC8583689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.