Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34769980›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

The Wildman Programme-Rehabilitation and Reconnection with Nature for Men with Mental or Physical Health Problems-A Matched-Control Study.

Simon Høegmark, Tonny Elmose Andersen, Patrik Grahn, Anna Mejldal, Kirsten K Roessler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Interactions with Nature, Good for the Mind and Body: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Review
  4. Evaluation of Health-Related Quality of Life and Mental Health in 729 Medical Students in Indonesia During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2023
    Article
  5. The Importance of the Outdoor Environment for the Recovery of Psychiatric Patients: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  6. Can Rehabilitation in Nature Improve Self-Perceived Interpersonal Problems? A Matched-Control Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Simon HøegmarkDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Tonny Elmose AndersenDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Patrik GrahnDepartment of People and Society, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-234 56 Alnarp, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7570-8992
Anna MejldalUnit of Clinical Alcohol Research, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark.
Kirsten K RoesslerDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-6605-7999

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Men with health problems refuse to participate in rehabilitation programmes and drop out of healthcare offerings more often than women. Therefore, a nature-based rehabilitation programme was tailored specific to men with mental health problems, and long-term illnesses. The rehabilitation programme combines the use of nature, body, mind, and community spirit (NBMC) and is called the 'Wildman Programme'. The presented study was designed as a matched-control study with an intervention group participating in the Wildman Programme (N = 114) compared to a control group receiving treatment as usual (N = 39). Outcomes were measured at baseline (T1), post-intervention (T2), and 6 months post-intervention (T3). The primary outcome was the participants' quality of life measured by WHOQOL-BREF, which consists of four domains: physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment. The secondary outcomes were the level of stress measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and the participants' emotional experience in relation to nature, measured by the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS). The intervention group improved significantly in the physical and psychological WHOQOL-BREF domains and in PSS at both follow-ups. The participants' interest in using nature for restoration increased significantly as well. The only detectable difference between the control group and the intervention group was in the WHOQOL-BREF physical domain at the 6-month follow-up. For further studies, we recommend testing the effect of the Wildman Programme in an RCT study.

Indexed as

Mental HealthQuality of LifeFemaleHumansMalechronic diseasesinstorationlong-term illnessesmental healthnature-based rehabilitationNBMC methodquality of liferestorative environmentsstresssupportive environments

Identifiers

PMID34769980
PMCPMC8582821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.