Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34769819›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Review of Deep Learning-Based Atrial Fibrillation Detection Studies.

Fatma Murat, Ferhat Sadak, Ozal Yildirim, Muhammed Talo, Ender Murat, Murat Karabatak, Yakup Demir, Ru-San Tan, U Rajendra Acharya

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Fatma MuratDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Firat University, Elazig 23000, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6881-9117
Ferhat SadakDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Bartin University, Bartin 74100, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-2391-4836
Ozal YildirimDepartment of Software Engineering, Firat University, Elazig 23000, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5375-3012
Muhammed TaloDepartment of Software Engineering, Firat University, Elazig 23000, Turkey.
Ender MuratDepartment of Cardiology, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06000, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-0147-5476
Murat KarabatakDepartment of Software Engineering, Firat University, Elazig 23000, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6719-7421
Yakup DemirDepartment of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Firat University, Elazig 23000, Turkey.
Ru-San TanDepartment of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore 169609, Singapore.
U Rajendra AcharyaDepartment of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Ngee Ann Polytechnic, Singapore 138607, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-2689-8552
Fırat University · TRAsia University · TWBartin University · TRDuke-NUS Medical School · SGGülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia that can lead to stroke, heart failure, and premature death. Manual screening of AF on electrocardiography (ECG) is time-consuming and prone to errors. To overcome these limitations, computer-aided diagnosis systems are developed using artificial intelligence techniques for automated detection of AF. Various machine learning and deep learning (DL) techniques have been developed for the automated detection of AF. In this review, we focused on the automated AF detection models developed using DL techniques. Twenty-four relevant articles published in international journals were reviewed. DL models based on deep neural network, convolutional neural network (CNN), recurrent neural network, long short-term memory, and hybrid structures were discussed. Our analysis showed that the majority of the studies used CNN models, which yielded the highest detection performance using ECG and heart rate variability signals. Details of the ECG databases used in the studies, performance metrics of the various models deployed, associated advantages and limitations, as well as proposed future work were summarized and discussed. This review paper serves as a useful resource for the researchers interested in developing innovative computer-assisted ECG-based DL approaches for AF detection.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationDeep LearningAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceElectrocardiographyHumansNeural Networks, Computerarrhythmia detectionatrial fibrillationdeep learningdeep neural networksECG

Identifiers

PMID34769819
PMCPMC8583162
OpenAlexW3210000721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.