Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34769793›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Access to Assistive Technology during the COVID-19 Global Pandemic: Voices of Users and Families.

Natasha Layton, Daniel Mont, Louise Puli, Irene Calvo, Kylie Shae, Emma Tebbutt, Keith D Hill, Libby Callaway, Diana Hiscock, Abner Manlapaz and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Technology for Adults with Intellectual Disability: Secondary Analysis of a Scoping Review.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Assistive Technology Provider Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Natasha LaytonRehabilitation Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3213-8069
Daniel MontCenter for Inclusive Policy, Washington, DC 20005, USA.
Louise PuliAccess to Assistive Technology Team, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1866-0088
Irene CalvoAccess to Assistive Technology Team, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Kylie ShaeAccess to Assistive Technology Team, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Emma TebbuttAccess to Assistive Technology Team, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
Keith D HillRehabilitation Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2191-0308
Libby CallawayRehabilitation Ageing and Independent Living (RAIL) Research Centre, Monash University, Melbourne 3800, Australia.
Diana HiscockHelpAge International, London SE1 7RL, UK.
Abner ManlapazCenter for Inclusive Policy, Washington, DC 20005, USA.
Inge GroenewegenLiliane Foundation, 5211 TX 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Mahpekai SidiqiKabul Orthopedic Organization, Kabul 1001, Afghanistan.ORCID 0000-0002-8618-7886
World Health Organization · CHMonash University · AUExpertise Center Vocational Education · NLHelpAge International · GB

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The SARS COVID-19 pandemic emerged in 2019 and has impacted people everywhere. Disparities in impact and outcomes are becoming apparent for individuals and communities which go beyond the trajectory of the disease itself, influenced by the strength and weaknesses of systems of universal health care, and the actions of civil society and government. This article is one of a series exploring COVID-19-related experiences of assistive technology (AT) users across the globe and implications for AT systems strengthening. AT such as mobility products, braille devices, and information communication technologies are key enablers of functioning, necessary to the achievement of the UN Sustainable Development Goals and enshrined in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. Reporting on a survey of 73 AT users across six global regions, we demonstrate that minority groups already living with health inequities are unduly impacted. An AT ecosystem analysis was conducted using the WHO GATE 5P framework, that is, people, products, personnel, provision and policy. AT users and families call for inclusive pandemic responses which encompass their needs across the lifespan, from very young to very old. We offer specific recommendations for future action to strengthen access to AT across public policy and civil society in pandemic preparedness and response.

Indexed as

COVID-19Persons with DisabilitiesSelf-Help DevicesEcosystemHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2ageingassistive productsassistive technologyCOVID-19disabilityhealth systemshealth workforcepersonnelpolicyservice provisionuniversal health coverage

Identifiers

PMID34769793
PMCPMC8583592
OpenAlexW3210236293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.