ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Mid- to Long-Term Result of Joint-Preserving Surgery in Comparison with Resection Arthroplasty.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors and Prevention of Hallux Valgus Recurrence After Primary Surgical Correction: A Structured Narrative Review.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Impact of Foot Surgery and Pharmacological Treatments on Functionality and Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Inflammatory Link of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Thrombosis: Pathogenic Molecular Circuits and Treatment Approaches.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Patients' Experiences Following Osteoarticular Foot Surgery for Rheumatoid Arthritis-Related Deformities: A Qualitative Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- First Metatarsophalangeal Joint-Preserving Surgery Is Effective for Forefoot Deformity With Moderate to Severe Joint Destruction in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Foot & ankle orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Foot Anthropometry Measures in Relation to Treatment in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Longitudinal Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Outcomes of Joint-Preserving Surgery for Rheumatoid Forefoot Deformity: An Editorial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundJoint-preserving surgery for the forefoot has been increasingly performed for rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We compared joint-preserving surgeries with resection arthroplasty for RA in the forefoot.
methodsForefoot surgeries were performed on 62 toes in 42 patients with RA (men: 2; women: 40) between 2002 and 2018. Three groups were compared: PP-31 toes treated with joint-preserving surgery involving the modified Mann method for the big toe and offset osteotomy for lesser toes, PR-15 toes treated with joint-preserving surgery for the big toe and resection arthroplasty for lesser toes, and RR-16 toes treated with resection arthroplasty for all the toes.
resultsThe PP group had significantly higher mean scores on a scale for RA in the foot and ankle at the latest follow-up than the RR group (86 vs. 75 points;
conclusionsJoint-preserving surgery is superior to resection arthroplasty in preventing function loss and the recurrence of hallux valgus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.