ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021
Effect of UV
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Box-Behnken design approach for optimizing the removal of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs from environmental water samples using magnetic nanocomposite.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Thermal shock treatment of recyclable bimetallic MOF derived carbon composite for organics oxidation by advanced Fenton-Like technique.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Preparation of magnetite nanoparticles and their application in the removal of methylene blue dye from wastewater.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Enhanced removal of tetrabromobisphenolA (TBBPA) from e-waste by Fe-S nanoparticles and Fe-S/CuS nanocomposite with response surface methodology (RSM).Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, we synthesized a novel MAC nanocomposite using almond's green hull coated with CuS. The whole set of experiments have been conducted inside a batch (discontinuous reactor system) at room temperature. The effectiveness of different parameters in tetracycline removal pH (3, 5, 7, and 9), pollutant concentration (5-100 mg/L), nanocomposite dosage (0.025-1 g/L), and contact time (5-60 min) using newly synthesized nanocomposite were investigated. Based on the results, in the optimal conditions of pH = 9, nanocomposite dosage of 1 g/L, pollutant concentration of 20 mg/L, contact time of 60 min, and room temperature, 95% removal efficiency was obtained. In MAC/CuS/UV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.