Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34769621›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Community Resident Perceptions of and Experiences with Precarious Work at the Neighborhood Level: The Greater Lawndale Healthy Work Project.

Jeni Hebert-Beirne, Jennifer K Felner, Teresa Berumen, Sylvia Gonzalez, Melissa Mosley Chrusfield, Preethi Pratap, Lorraine M Conroy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jeni Hebert-BeirneDivision of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Jennifer K FelnerSchool of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9915-4637
Teresa BerumenCenter for Health and Social Care Integration, Rush University System for Health, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Sylvia GonzalezGreater Lawndale Healthy Work Project, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Melissa Mosley ChrusfieldLawndale Christian Health Center, Chicago, IL 60623, USA.
Preethi PratapDivision of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Lorraine M ConroyDivision of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USRush University · USSan Diego State University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Oregon Healthy WorkLife CenterU19OH010154 · OH · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HAMMER, LESLIE, OLSON, RYAN · 2011 to 2025
$17.2M
Pilot Program CoreP30ES027792 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Gokhan M. Mutlu, Gail S Prins · 2017 to 2026
$13.6M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES027792NIOSH CDC HHS U19OH010154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Work is a key social determinant of health. Community health and well-being may be impacted in neighborhoods with high proportions of people engaged in precarious work situations compounded by health inequities produced by other social determinants associated with their residential geography. However, little is known about how community residents experience work at the neighborhood level nor how work impacts health at the community-level, particularly in communities with a high proportion of residents engaged in precarious work. We sought to understand, through participatory research strategies, how work is experienced at the community level and to identify community interventions to establish a culture of healthy work. As part of a mixed-methods community health assessment, community researchers conducted focus groups with residents in two high social and economic hardship neighborhoods on Chicago's southwest side. Community and academic researchers engaged in participatory data analysis and developed and implemented member-checking modules to engage residents in the data interpretation process. Twelve focus group discussions (77 community resident participants) were completed. Three major themes emerged: systematic marginalization from the pathways to healthy work situations; contextual and structural hostility to sustain healthy work; and violations in the rights, agency, and autonomy of resident workers. Findings were triangulated with findings from the concept-mapping research component of the project to inform the development of a community health survey focused on work characteristics and experiences. Listening to residents in communities with a high proportion of residents engaging in precarious work allows for the identification of nuanced community-informed intervention points to begin to build a culture of healthy work.

Indexed as

PovertyResidence CharacteristicsCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchFocus GroupsHumansPerceptionPublic Healthcommunity-based participatory researchcommunity healthoccupational healthprecarious workqualitative researchsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID34769621
PMCPMC8582666
OpenAlexW3208392481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.