Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34769604›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

A Systematic Literature Review of Quality Management Initiatives in Dental Clinics.

Emil Lucian Crisan, Bogdan Florin Covaliu, Diana Maria Chis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emil Lucian CrisanFaculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Management, Babes-Bolyai University, 400591 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-7076-3386
Bogdan Florin CovaliuFaculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine, Public Health and Management, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy Cluj-Napoca, 400337 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5027-5649
Diana Maria ChisFaculty of Economics and Business Administration, Department of Finance, Babes-Bolyai University, 400591 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-2804-7113

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By considering the recently proposed definitions and metrics, oral healthcare quality management (OHQM) emerges as a distinct field in the wider healthcare area. The goal of this paper is to systematically review quality management initiatives (QMIs) implementation by dental clinics. The research methodology approach is a review of 72 sources that have been analyzed using the Context-Intervention-Mechanism-Outcome Framework (CIMO). The analysis identifies five mechanisms that explain how quality management initiatives are implemented by dental clinics. The simplest QMIs implementations are related to (1) overall quality. The next ones, in terms of complexity, are related to (2) patient satisfaction, (3) service quality, (4) internal processes improvement, and (5) business outcomes. This paper is the first attempt to provide a critical review of this topic and represents an important advancement by providing a theoretical framework that explains how quality management is implemented by practitioners in this field. The results can be used by scholars for advancing their studies related to this emerging research area and by healthcare managers in order to better implement their quality management initiatives.

Indexed as

Dental ClinicsQuality of Health CareDelivery of Health CareHealth FacilitiesHumansCIMO frameworkdental clinicsoral healthcare quality managementquality management initiativesystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID34769604
PMCPMC8582852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.