Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34769535›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Andrea Leuenberger, Olga Cambaco, Hyacinthe R Zabré, Isaac Lyatuu, Jürg Utzinger, Khátia Munguambe, Sonja Merten, Mirko S Winkler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Resource Allocation Equity in the China's Rural Three-Tier Healthcare System.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea LeuenbergerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6116-148X
Olga CambacoSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5891-2318
Hyacinthe R ZabréSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Isaac LyatuuSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Jürg UtzingerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Khátia MunguambeManhiça Health Research Centre, Maputo C.P. 1929, Mozambique.ORCID 0000-0003-3888-5126
Sonja MertenSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4115-106X
Mirko S WinklerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, P.O. Box, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7387-3863

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth equity features prominently in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, yet there are wide disparities in health between and within countries. In settings of natural resource extraction (e.g., industrial mines), the health of surrounding communities is affected through myriad changes in the physical, social, and economic environment. How changes triggered by such projects translate into health inequities is poorly understood.

methodsThis qualitative study explores potential layers of inequities by systematically coding perceived inequities of affected communities. Drawing on the framework method, we thematically analyzed data from 83 focus group discussions, which enrolled 791 participants from 10 study sites in Burkina Faso, Mozambique, and Tanzania.

resultsParticipants perceived inequities related to their individual characteristics, intermediate factors acting on the community level, and structural conditions. Due to environmental pollution and land loss, participants were concerned about unsecured livelihoods. Positive impacts, such as job opportunities at the mine, remained scarce for local communities and were claimed not to be equally distributed among community members.

conclusionExtractive industries bear considerable risks to widen existing health gaps. In order to create equal opportunities among affected populations, the wider determinants of health must be considered more explicitly in the licensing process of resource extraction projects.

Indexed as

Health EquityMiningBurkina FasoHumansMozambiqueTanzaniacommunity-based researchequityextractive industriesfocus group discussionhealth impact assessmentsocial determinants of healthsub-Saharan AfricaSustainable Development Goals

Identifiers

PMID34769535
PMCPMC8582703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.