Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34769464›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Leaf Apoplast of Field-Grown Potato Analyzed by Quantitative Proteomics and Activity-Based Protein Profiling.

Kibrom B Abreha, Erik Alexandersson, Svante Resjö, Åsa Lankinen, Daniela Sueldo, Farnusch Kaschani, Markus Kaiser, Renier A L van der Hoorn, Fredrik Levander, Erik Andreasson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Plant Proteomic Research 4.0: Frontiers in Stress Resilience.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kibrom B AbrehaDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-234 22 Lomma, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8084-8340
Erik AlexanderssonDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-234 22 Lomma, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-6320-2492
Svante ResjöDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-234 22 Lomma, Sweden.
Åsa LankinenDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-234 22 Lomma, Sweden.
Daniela SueldoPlant Chemetics Laboratory, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RB, UK.
Farnusch KaschaniChemische Biologie, Zentrum für Medizinische Biotechnologie, Fakultät für Biologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 2, 45117 Essen, Germany.
Markus KaiserChemische Biologie, Zentrum für Medizinische Biotechnologie, Fakultät für Biologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Universitätsstr. 2, 45117 Essen, Germany.
Renier A L van der HoornPlant Chemetics Laboratory, Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RB, UK.
Fredrik LevanderDepartment of Immunotechnology, Lund University, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0710-9792
Erik AndreassonDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-234 22 Lomma, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0666-7204
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DEUniversity of Oxford · GBLund University · SE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft M.K.; grant No. INST 20876/127-1 FUGGERC Consolidator grant D.S. and RvdH, grant No. 616449ERC starting grant M.K.; grant No. 258413Formas 2020-01211SLF R-19-25-282
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple biotic and abiotic stresses challenge plants growing in agricultural fields. Most molecular studies have aimed to understand plant responses to challenges under controlled conditions. However, studies on field-grown plants are scarce, limiting application of the findings in agricultural conditions. In this study, we investigated the composition of apoplastic proteomes of potato cultivar Bintje grown under field conditions, i.e., two field sites in June-August across two years and fungicide treated and untreated, using quantitative proteomics, as well as its activity using activity-based protein profiling (ABPP). Samples were clustered and some proteins showed significant intensity and activity differences, based on their field site and sampling time (June-August), indicating differential regulation of certain proteins in response to environmental or developmental factors. Peroxidases, class II chitinases, pectinesterases, and osmotins were among the proteins more abundant later in the growing season (July-August) as compared to early in the season (June). We did not detect significant differences between fungicide Shirlan treated and untreated field samples in two growing seasons. Using ABPP, we showed differential activity of serine hydrolases and β-glycosidases under greenhouse and field conditions and across a growing season. Furthermore, the activity of serine hydrolases and β-glycosidases, including proteins related to biotic stress tolerance, decreased as the season progressed. The generated proteomics data would facilitate further studies aiming at understanding mechanisms of molecular plant physiology in agricultural fields and help applying effective strategies to mitigate biotic and abiotic stresses.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalEcosystemPlant LeavesPlant ProteinsProteomeProteomicsSolanum tuberosumStress, PhysiologicalPlant ProteinsProteomeABPPapoplastfield-omicspotatoproteomicsserine hydrolasesβ-glycosidases

Identifiers

PMID34769464
PMCPMC8584485
OpenAlexW3211974961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.