Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34769297›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

The Clinical Application of Pulsed Radiofrequency Induces Inflammatory Pain via MAPKs Activation: A Novel Hint for Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment.

Feng-Yen Lin, Kuo-Feng Huang, Jui-Chieh Chen, Meng-Fu Lai, Kuo-Hsing Ma, Chun-Chang Yeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Feng-Yen LinDepartment of Internal Medicine and Taipei Heart Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4939-2899
Kuo-Feng HuangDepartment of Internal Medicine and Taipei Heart Institute, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan.
Jui-Chieh ChenDepartment of Biochemical Science and Technology, National Chiayi University, Chiayi 600, Taiwan.
Meng-Fu LaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Kuo-Hsing MaDepartment of Biology and Anatomy, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.
Chun-Chang YehDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7706-5991
Tri-Service General Hospital · TWChi Mei Medical Center · TWNational Chiayi University · TWNational Defense Medical Center · TWTaipei Medical University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) works by delivering short bursts of radiofrequency to a target nerve, thereby affecting nerve signal transduction to reduce pain. Although preliminary clinical investigations have shown that PRF treatment can be used safely as an alternative interventional treatment in patients with refractory pain conditions, unexpected damage to a normal nerve/ganglion is still one of the possible complications of using the PRF strategy. Noxious pain may also be triggered if PRF treatment accidentally damages an intact nerve. However, few studies in the literature have described the intracellular modifications that occur in neuronal cells after PRF stimulation. Therefore, in this study, we evaluated the effects of PRF on unimpaired nerve function and investigated the potential mechanisms of PRF-induced pain. Wistar rats were stimulated with 30-60 V of PRF for 6 min, and mechanical allodynia, cold hypersensitivity, cytokine and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) production, and mitogen-activated protein kinase activity (p38 MAPK, ERK1/2, JNK/SAPK) were analyzed. The results indicated that PRF stimulation induced a significant algesic effect and nociceptive response. In addition, the protein array and Western blotting analyses showed that the clinical application of 60 V of PRF can induce the activation of MAPKs and the production of inflammatory cytokines and MMPs in the lumbar dorsal horn, which is necessary for nerve inflammation, and it can be suppressed by MAPK antagonist treatment. These results indicate that PRF stimulation may induce inflammation of the intact nerve, which in turn causes inflammatory pain. This conclusion can also serve as a reminder for PRF treatment of refractory pain.

Indexed as

AnimalsCryopyrin-Associated Periodic SyndromesCytokinesGanglia, SpinalHyperalgesiaMaleMatrix Metalloproteinasesp38 Mitogen-Activated Protein KinasesPainPulsed Radiofrequency TreatmentRandom AllocationRatsRats, WistarSpinal CordCytokinesMatrix Metalloproteinasesp38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinasesmitogen-activated protein kinasespainpulsed radiofrequency

Identifiers

PMID34769297
PMCPMC8584518
OpenAlexW3211112499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.