Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34768940›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

Mouse Models of CMML.

Ekaterina Belotserkovskaya, Oleg Demidov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ekaterina BelotserkovskayaLaboratory of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 4 Tikhoretskii Prospect, 194064 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3985-9552
Oleg DemidovLaboratory of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 4 Tikhoretskii Prospect, 194064 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4323-7174
Institute of Cytology · RULa Ligue Contre le Cancer · FR

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 19-75-20128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare and challenging type of myeloproliferative neoplasm. Poor prognosis and high mortality, associated predominantly with progression to secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML), is still an unsolved problem. Despite a growing body of knowledge about the molecular repertoire of this disease, at present, the prognostic significance of CMML-associated mutations is controversial. The absence of available CMML cell lines and the small number of patients with CMML make pre-clinical testing and clinical trials complicated. Currently, specific therapy for CMML has not been approved; most of the currently available therapeutic approaches are based on myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and other myeloproliferative neoplasm (MNP) studies. In this regard, the development of the robust CMML animal models is currently the focus of interest. This review describes important studies concerning animal models of CMML, examples of methodological approaches, and the obtained hematologic phenotypes.

Indexed as

AnimalsEpigenesis, GeneticHeterograftsHumansLeukemia, ExperimentalLeukemia, Myelomonocytic, ChronicMiceMutationOncogenesPhenotypechronic myelomonocytic leukemiaCMMLmouse models

Identifiers

PMID34768940
PMCPMC8584008
OpenAlexW3210632258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.