Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34768745›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2021

β-Barrels and Amyloids: Structural Transitions, Biological Functions, and Pathogenesis.

Anna I Sulatskaya, Anastasiia O Kosolapova, Alexander G Bobylev, Mikhail V Belousov, Kirill S Antonets, Maksim I Sulatsky, Irina M Kuznetsova, Konstantin K Turoverov, Olesya V Stepanenko, Anton A Nizhnikov

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cyclic Isothiocyanate Goitrin ImpairsPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. OmpC and OmpF Outer Membrane Proteins ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. RopB protein ofFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna I SulatskayaLaboratory for Proteomics of Supra-Organismal Systems, All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, 3 Podbelskogo Sh., Pushkin, 196608 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-1207-3384
Anastasiia O KosolapovaLaboratory for Proteomics of Supra-Organismal Systems, All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, 3 Podbelskogo Sh., Pushkin, 196608 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-1674-8809
Alexander G BobylevInstitute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 3 Institutskaya St., 142290 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-9477-1214
Mikhail V BelousovLaboratory for Proteomics of Supra-Organismal Systems, All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, 3 Podbelskogo Sh., Pushkin, 196608 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7856-9075
Kirill S AntonetsLaboratory for Proteomics of Supra-Organismal Systems, All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, 3 Podbelskogo Sh., Pushkin, 196608 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8575-2601
Maksim I SulatskyLaboratory of Cell Morphology, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 4 Tikhoretsky Av., 194064 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-4665-3181
Irina M KuznetsovaLaboratory of Structural Dynamics, Stability and Folding of Proteins, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 4 Tikhoretsky Av., 194064 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-3336-4834
Konstantin K TuroverovLaboratory of Structural Dynamics, Stability and Folding of Proteins, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 4 Tikhoretsky Av., 194064 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6977-1896
Olesya V StepanenkoLaboratory of Structural Dynamics, Stability and Folding of Proteins, Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 4 Tikhoretsky Av., 194064 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3779-6711
Anton A NizhnikovLaboratory for Proteomics of Supra-Organismal Systems, All-Russia Research Institute for Agricultural Microbiology, 3 Podbelskogo Sh., Pushkin, 196608 St. Petersburg, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8338-3494
Institute of Cytology · RUSt Petersburg University · RUAll-Russian Research Institute of Agricultural Microbiology · RUInstitute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics · RU

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 17-16-01100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insoluble protein aggregates with fibrillar morphology called amyloids and β-barrel proteins both share a β-sheet-rich structure. Correctly folded β-barrel proteins can not only function in monomeric (dimeric) form, but also tend to interact with one another-followed, in several cases, by formation of higher order oligomers or even aggregates. In recent years, findings proving that β-barrel proteins can adopt cross-β amyloid folds have emerged. Different β-barrel proteins were shown to form amyloid fibrils in vitro. The formation of functional amyloids in vivo by β-barrel proteins for which the amyloid state is native was also discovered. In particular, several prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins with β-barrel domains were demonstrated to form amyloids in vivo, where they participate in interspecies interactions and nutrient storage, respectively. According to recent observations, despite the variety of primary structures of amyloid-forming proteins, most of them can adopt a conformational state with the β-barrel topology. This state can be intermediate on the pathway of fibrillogenesis ("on-pathway state"), or can be formed as a result of an alternative assembly of partially unfolded monomers ("off-pathway state"). The β-barrel oligomers formed by amyloid proteins possess toxicity, and are likely to be involved in the development of amyloidoses, thus representing promising targets for potential therapy of these incurable diseases. Considering rapidly growing discoveries of the amyloid-forming β-barrels, we may suggest that their real number and diversity of functions are significantly higher than identified to date, and represent only "the tip of the iceberg". Here, we summarize the data on the amyloid-forming β-barrel proteins, their physicochemical properties, and their biological functions, and discuss probable means and consequences of the amyloidogenesis of these proteins, along with structural relationships between these two widespread types of β-folds.

Indexed as

AmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloidogenic ProteinsAmyloidosisHumansMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein AggregatesProtein Conformation, beta-StrandAmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesAmyloidogenic ProteinsProtein Aggregatesamyloidamyloid aggregationamyloid fibrilsamyloidosisprotein aggregationβ-barrel proteins

Identifiers

PMID34768745
PMCPMC8582884
OpenAlexW3205390450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.