Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34768540›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Machine Learning Prediction Models for Mortality in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Lactic Acidosis.

Pattharawin Pattharanitima, Charat Thongprayoon, Wisit Kaewput, Fawad Qureshi, Fahad Qureshi, Tananchai Petnak, Narat Srivali, Guido Gembillo, Oisin A O'Corragain, Supavit Chesdachai and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Development and Validation of a Multivariable Machine Learning Model for Mortality Prediction among Intensive Care Unit Patients.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Pattharawin PattharanitimaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, Pathum Thani 12121, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-6010-0033
Charat ThongprayoonDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Wisit KaewputDepartment of Military and Community Medicine, Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-2920-7235
Fawad QureshiDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Fahad QureshiSchool of Medicine, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1117-1350
Tananchai PetnakDivision of Pulmonary and Pulmonary Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-7633-4029
Narat SrivaliDivision of Pulmonary Medicine, St. Agnes Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21229, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6945-329X
Guido GembilloUnit of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4823-9910
Oisin A O'CorragainDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Supavit ChesdachaiDivision of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Saraschandra VallabhajosyulaSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1631-8238
Pramod K GuruCritical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Michael A MaoDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1814-7003
Vesna D GarovicDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
John J DillonDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Wisit CheungpasitpornDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9954-9711
Mayo Clinic · USMahidol University · THMayo Clinic in Florida · USPhramongkutklao Hospital · THSaint Agnes Hospital · USTemple University Hospital · USThammasat University · THUniversity of Messina · ITWake Forest University · USWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLactic acidosis is the most common cause of anion gap metabolic acidosis in the intensive care unit (ICU), associated with poor outcomes including mortality. We sought to compare machine learning (ML) approaches versus logistic regression analysis for prediction of mortality in lactic acidosis patients admitted to the ICU.

methodsWe used the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-III) database to identify ICU adult patients with lactic acidosis (serum lactate ≥4 mmol/L). The outcome of interest was hospital mortality. We developed prediction models using four ML approaches consisting of random forest (RF), decision tree (DT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), artificial neural network (ANN), and statistical modeling with forward stepwise logistic regression using the testing dataset. We then assessed model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, precision, error rate, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), F1 score, and assessed model calibration using the Brier score, in the independent testing dataset.

resultsOf 1919 lactic acidosis ICU patients, 1535 and 384 were included in the training and testing dataset, respectively. Hospital mortality was 30%. RF had the highest AUROC at 0.83, followed by logistic regression 0.81, XGBoost 0.81, ANN 0.79, and DT 0.71. In addition, RF also had the highest accuracy (0.79), MCC (0.45), F1 score (0.56), and lowest error rate (21.4%). The RF model was the most well-calibrated. The Brier score for RF, DT, XGBoost, ANN, and multivariable logistic regression was 0.15, 0.19, 0.18, 0.19, and 0.16, respectively. The RF model outperformed multivariable logistic regression model, SOFA score (AUROC 0.74), SAP II score (AUROC 0.77), and Charlson score (AUROC 0.69).

conclusionThe ML prediction model using RF algorithm provided the highest predictive performance for hospital mortality among ICU patient with lactic acidosis.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecritical carecritical care medicineindividualized medicineintensive care unitlactatelactic acidlactic acidosismachine learningmortalitynephrologypersonalized medicineprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID34768540
PMCPMC8584535
OpenAlexW3209559322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.