Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34768518›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021

Radiographic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Biomaterials Used for Lateral Sinus Augmentation: A Systematic Review on the Effect of Residual Bone Height and Vertical Graft Size on New Bone Formation and Graft Shrinkage.

Paolo Pesce, Maria Menini, Luigi Canullo, Shahnawaz Khijmatgar, Laura Modenese, Gianmarco Gallifante, Massimo Del Fabbro

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Paolo PesceDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, Ospedale S. Martino, L. Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8726-4145
Maria MeniniDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, Ospedale S. Martino, L. Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6503-1201
Luigi CanulloDepartment of Periodontology, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9875-2929
Shahnawaz KhijmatgarDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9177-3505
Laura ModeneseDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, Ospedale S. Martino, L. Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Gianmarco GallifanteDepartment of Surgical Sciences (DISC), University of Genoa, Ospedale S. Martino, L. Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Massimo Del FabbroDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical, and Dental Sciences, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7144-0984
University of Genoa · ITUniversity of Milan · ITUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present systematic review was to investigate the effect of residual bone height (RBH) and vertical bone gain on new bone formation (NBF) and graft shrinkage after lateral sinus lifts using different biomaterials.

methodsAn electronic search was conducted on three databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until January 2021 with at least one follow-up at 6 months and at least five patients treated, comparing biomaterials used for maxillary sinus augmentation with a lateral approach. Graft volumetric changes, RBH, vertical bone gain, implant failure, and post-operative complications were evaluated. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool.

resultsWe used 4010 identified studies, of which 21 were RCTs. Overall, 412 patients and 533 sinuses were evaluated. Only three publications had an overall low risk of bias. After 6 months, xenograft (XG) showed the least volume reduction (7.30 ± 15.49%), while autogenous graft (AU) was the most reabsorbed (41.71 ± 12.63%). NBF appeared to not be directly correlated with RBH; on the contrary, the overall linear regression analysis showed that NBF significantly decreased by 1.6% for each mm of postoperative vertical graft gain. This finding suggests that the greater the augmentation, the lower the NBF. A similar tendency, with a regression coefficient even higher than the overall one, was also observed with alloplast (AP) and XG.

conclusionsThe present results suggested that NBF was essentially independent of preoperative bone height. On the contrary, the smaller the volume was of the graft placed, the higher the amount of new bone formed, and the smaller the graft shrinkage was. Minimizing the augmentation volume might be beneficial to graft healing and stability especially when using AP and XG.

Indexed as

biomaterialsbone regenerationgraftssinus lift

Identifiers

PMID34768518
PMCPMC8584826
OpenAlexW3211131047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.