Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34768487›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Six-Month Results on Treatment Adherence, Physical Activity, Spinal Appearance, Spinal Deformity, and Quality of Life in an Ongoing Randomised Trial on Conservative Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (CONTRAIS).

Marlene Dufvenberg, Elias Diarbakerli, Anastasios Charalampidis, Birgitta Öberg, Hans Tropp, Anna Aspberg Ahl, Hans Möller, Paul Gerdhem, Allan Abbott

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Effect of the Rovatti MethodReports (MDPI) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Defining "successful" treatment outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marlene DufvenbergDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, SE 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3639-6380
Elias DiarbakerliDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Orthopaedics and Biotechnology, Karolinska Institutet, SE 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
Anastasios CharalampidisDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Orthopaedics and Biotechnology, Karolinska Institutet, SE 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5228-738X
Birgitta ÖbergDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, SE 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8612-583X
Hans TroppDepartment of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, SE 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Anna Aspberg AhlDepartment of Orthopaedics, Ryhov County Hospital, SE 551 85 Jönköping, Sweden.
Hans MöllerDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Orthopaedics and Biotechnology, Karolinska Institutet, SE 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
Paul GerdhemDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Orthopaedics and Biotechnology, Karolinska Institutet, SE 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden.
Allan AbbottDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, SE 581 83 Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4318-9216

Funding

Paul Gerdhem was supported by Region Stockholm (clinical research appointment). Clinical research appointmentThe regional agreement on medical training and clinical research (ALF) between Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet and Linköpings University and the Swedish Society of Spinal Surgeons ALFThe Swedish Research Council Dnr 521-2012-1771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) often receive conservative treatments aiming to prevent progression of the spinal deformity during puberty. This study aimed to explore patient adherence and secondary outcomes during the first 6 months in an ongoing randomised controlled trial of three treatment interventions. Interventions consisted of physical activity combined with either hypercorrective Boston brace night shift (NB), scoliosis-specific exercise (SSE), or physical activity alone (PA). Measures at baseline and 6 months included angle of trunk rotation (ATR), Cobb angle, International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF), pictorial Spinal Appearance Questionnaire (pSAQ), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22r), EuroQol 5-Dimensions Youth (EQ-5D-Y) and Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS). Patient adherence, motivation, and capability in performing the intervention were reported at 6 months. The study included 135 patients (111 females) with AIS and >1-year estimated remaining growth, mean age 12.7 (1.4) years, and mean Cobb angle 31 (±5.3). At 6 months, the proportion of patients in the groups reporting high to very high adherence ranged between 72 and 95%, while motivation ranged between 65 and 92%, with the highest proportion seen in the NB group (

Indexed as

adherencebracinghealth-related quality of lifeidiopathic scoliosisphysical activityphysiotherapeutic scoliosis-specific exercisespinal appearance

Identifiers

PMID34768487
PMCPMC8585057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.