Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34768473›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Sex Differences in Clinical Course and Intensive Care Unit Admission in a National Cohort of Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19.

Irit Nachtigall, Marzia Bonsignore, Petra Thürmann, Sven Hohenstein, Katarzyna Jóźwiak, Michael Hauptmann, Sandra Eifert, Julius Dengler, Andreas Bollmann, Heinrich V Groesdonk and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Irit NachtigallDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Infection Prevention, Helios Hospital Emil-von-Behring, 14165 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9976-9295
Marzia BonsignoreCenter for Hygiene, Evangelische Kliniken Gelsenkirchen, 45879 Gelsenkirchen, Germany.
Petra ThürmannPhilipp Klee-Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9724-1422
Sven HohensteinDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-1593
Katarzyna JóźwiakInstitute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany.
Michael HauptmannInstitute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, 16816 Neuruppin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8539-0148
Sandra EifertDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Julius DenglerBrandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Campus Bad Saarow, 15526 Bad Saarow, Germany.
Andreas BollmannDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5441-3906
Heinrich V GroesdonkDepartment of Interdisciplinary Intensive and Intermediate Care, Helios Hospital Erfurt, 99089 Erfurt, Germany.
Ralf KuhlenHelios Health GmbH, 10117 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4670-6127
Andreas Meier-HellmannHelios Kliniken GmbH, 10117 Berlin, Germany.

Funding

Helios Kliniken HCRI ID 2020-0078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Males have a higher risk for an adverse outcome of COVID-19. The aim of the study was to analyze sex differences in the clinical course with focus on patients who received intensive care. Research was conducted as an observational retrospective cohort study. A group of 23,235 patients from 83 hospitals with PCR-confirmed infection with SARS-CoV-2 between 4 February 2020 and 22 March 2021 were included. Data on symptoms were retrieved from a separate registry, which served as a routine infection control system. Males accounted for 51.4% of all included patients. Males received more intensive care (ratio OR = 1.61, 95% CI = 1.51-1.71) and mechanical ventilation (invasive or noninvasive, OR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.73-2.01). A model for the prediction of mortality showed that until the age 60 y, mortality increased with age with no substantial difference between sexes. After 60 y, the risk of death increased more in males than in females. At 90 y, females had a predicted mortality risk of 31%, corresponding to males of 84 y. In the intensive care unit (ICU) cohort, females of 90 y had a mortality risk of 46%, equivalent to males of 72 y. Seventy-five percent of males over 90 died, but only 46% of females of the same age. In conclusion, the sex gap was most evident among the oldest in the ICU. Understanding sex-determined differences in COVID-19 can be useful to facilitate individualized treatments.

Indexed as

age dependencyCOVID-19intensive care unitmechanical ventilationsex differences

Identifiers

PMID34768473
PMCPMC8584819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.