Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34768459›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2021

Comparison of Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using O-arm Navigated Technique for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.

Ying Tan, Masato Tanaka, Sumeet Sonawane, Koji Uotani, Yoshiaki Oda, Yoshihiro Fujiwara, Shinya Arataki, Taro Yamauchi, Tomoyuki Takigawa, Yasuo Ito

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Comparative analysis of oblique lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for L5-S1 level: clinical and radiological outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ying TanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3766-8154
Masato TanakaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6685-7451
Sumeet SonawaneDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0239-5830
Koji UotaniDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5594-1292
Yoshiaki OdaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.
Yoshihiro FujiwaraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.
Shinya AratakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.
Taro YamauchiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Okayama 702-8055, Japan.
Tomoyuki TakigawaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe Red Cross Hospital, Hyogo 651-0073, Japan.
Yasuo ItoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe Red Cross Hospital, Hyogo 651-0073, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-PLIF/TLIF) are widely accepted procedures for lumbar instability due to degenerative or traumatic diseases. Oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) is currently receiving considerable attention because of the reductions in damage to the back muscles and neural tissue. The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of simultaneous single-position OLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation with MI-PLIF/TLIF. This retrospective comparative study included 98 patients, comprising 63 patients with single-position OLIF (Group SO) and 35 patients with MI-PLIF/TLIF (Group P/T). Cases with more than 1 year of follow-up were included in this study. Mean follow-up was 32.9 ± 7.0 months for Group SO and 33.7 ± 7.5 months for Group P/T. Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed. Comparing Group SO to Group P/T, surgical time and blood loss were 118 versus 172 min (

Indexed as

indirect decompressionO-arm navigationsimultaneous single-position oblique lateral interbody fusion

Identifiers

PMID34768459
PMCPMC8584546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.