ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2021
Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Caudate Lobectomy: A Systematic Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Postoperative Outcomes After Robotic Liver Resection of Caudate Lobe: A Systematic Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Pooled it
- Screening criteria for drainage-free patients after retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenal tumor resection and their prospective validation study value.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Hepatoduodenal ligament lifting technique using the round ligament of the liver during laparoscopic liver resection for hepatic caudate lobe tumor.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Robotic-Assisted Anatomical Caudate Lobe Resection with Glissonean Pedicle Approach. A Step-by-Step Surgical Technique (with Video).Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Complete hepatic caudate lobe resection: is robotic approach safe? Report from experienced centers.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Association between the paracaval branches of the caudate lobe and the three major hepatic veins in liver casts: Locating the cranial boundary of the caudate lobe.Global health & medicine · 2024Article
- Laparoscopic caudate lobe resections: How I do it: tips and pitfalls (with video).Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Is laparoscopic surgery a preferred option for benign conditions in the caudate lobe of the liver?Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2023Article
- Robotic versus laparoscopic major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcomes from a single institution.BMC surgery · 2022Article
- How to Do a Laparoscopic Caudate Lobectomy (With Video).ANZ journal of surgeryArticle
- Robotic Caudate Lobectomy: Feasibility and Techniques with Da Vinci Xi and SP Systems.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Resection of the caudate lobe of the liver is considered a highly challenging type of liver resection due to the region's intimacy with critical vascular structures and deep anatomic location inside the abdominal cavity. Laparoscopic resection of the caudate lobe is considered one of the most challenging laparoscopic liver procedures. The objective of our systematic review was to evaluate the safety, technical feasibility and main outcomes of laparoscopic caudate lobectomy LCL. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken for studies published until September 2021. A total of 20 studies comprising 221 patients were included. Of these subjects, 36% were women, whereas the vast majority of resections (66%) were performed for malignant tumors. Tumor size varied significantly between 2 and 160 mm in the largest diameter. The mean operative time was 210 min (range 60-740 min), and estimated blood loss was 173.6 mL (range 50-3600 mL). The median hospital length of stay LOS was 6.5 days (range 2-15 days). Seven cases of conversion to open were reported. The vast majority of patients (93.7%) underwent complete resection (R0) of their tumors. Thirty-six out of 221 patients developed postoperative complications, with 5.8% of all patients developing a major complication (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ III).No perioperative deaths were reported by the included studies. LCL seems to be a safe and feasible alternative to open caudate lobectomy OCL in selected patients when undertaken in high-volume centers by experienced surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.