Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34768166›Full record

ArticlePlacenta2022

Visual assessment of the placenta in antenatal magnetic resonance imaging across gestation in normal and compromised pregnancies: Observations from a large cohort study.

Alison Ho, Lucy C Chappell, Lisa Story, Mudher Al-Adnani, Alexia Egloff, Emma Routledge, Mary Rutherford, Jana Hutter

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Placenta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of fetal magnetic resonance imaging.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alison HoDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: alison.ho@kcl.ac.uk.
Lucy C ChappellDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Lisa StoryDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mudher Al-AdnaniDepartment of Cellular Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Alexia EgloffCentre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Emma RoutledgeCentre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mary RutherfordCentre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jana HutterCentre for the Developing Brain, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Biomedical Engineering Department, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

Structure and function of the placenta from implantation to delivery: a next generation MRI approachU01HD087202 · NICHD · KING'S COLLEGE LONDON · PI ALEXANDER, DANIEL, ALJABAR, PAUL · 2015 to 2015
$3.2M
Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/T018119/1NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD087202Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT 203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVisual assessment of the placenta in antenatal magnetic resonance imaging is important to confirm healthy appearances or to identify pathology complicating fetal anomaly or maternal disease.

methodsWe assessed the placenta in a large cohort of 228 women with low and high risk pregnancies across gestation. All women gave written informed consent and were imaged using either a 3T Philips Achieva or 1.5T Philips Ingenia scanner. Images were acquired with a T2-weighted single shot turbo spin echo sequence of the whole uterus (thereby including placenta) for anatomical information.

resultsA structured approach to visual assessment of the placenta on T2-weighted imaging has been provided including determination of key anatomical landmarks to aid orientation, placental shape, signal intensity, lobularity and granularity. Transient factors affecting imaging are shown including the effect of fetal movement, gross fetal motion and contractions. Placental appearances across gestation in low risk pregnancies are shown and compared to pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia and chronic hypertension. The utility of other magnetic resonance techniques (T2* mapping as an indirect marker for quantifying oxygenation) and histological assessment alongside visual assessment of placental T2-weighted imaging are demonstrated. DISCUSSION: A systematic approach with qualitative descriptors for placental visual assessment using T2-weighted imaging allows confirmation of normal placental development and can detect placental abnormalities in pregnancy complications. T2-weighted imaging can be visually assessed alongside functional imaging (such as T2* maps) in order to further probe the visual characteristics seen.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAnatomy, ArtisticAtlases as TopicCohort StudiesFemaleHumansPlacentaPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsUterusMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)PlacentaT2 weighted imaging

Identifiers

PMID34768166
PMCPMC8761363
OpenAlexW3204973956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.