ArticleAlcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)2022
Comparison of automated determination of phosphatidylethanol (PEth) in dried blood spots (DBS) with previous manual processing and testing.
Article in Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) is a sensitive and specific biomarker of alcohol consumption in the prior 2-3 weeks. Standard, manual PEth testing using dried blood spots (DBS) is a multi-step time-consuming process. A novel, automated processing and testing method has been developed to decrease DBS processing and testing time. We conducted automated testing, using regioisomerically pure PEth reference material, on randomly selected DBS, which had previously been tested via manual methods and then stored for 3-6 years at -80 °C, to compare the results (PEth 16:0/18:1 homologue). We chose samples for re-testing using categories found in the literature as follows: 1) PEth <20 ng/mL; 2) PEth 20-200 ng/mL; 3) PEth >200-1000 ng/mL; 4) PEth >1000 ng/mL. We calculated agreement between the categories using the weighted kappa statistic (n = 49 DBS). We quantified agreement between continuous measures using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and further described the relationship between variables using Spearman correlation. The median PEth result was 155 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR]: 1-1312 ng/mL) via automated methods and 98.8 ng/mL (IQR: 10.2-625.0 ng/mL) via manual methods. The weighted kappa comparing the automated to manual PEth results was 0.76 [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.66-0.86]. The ICC was 0.69 (95% CI: 0.54-0.79), and the Spearman correlation was 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99). While the new methods yielded somewhat higher PEth values, we found good to excellent agreement between clinically relevant PEth categories. Automated DBS processing and testing using new reference standards are promising methods for PEth testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.