ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
In-Person Verification of Deep Learning Algorithm for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Using Different Techniques Across Fundus Image Devices.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of artificial intelligence in diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Pooled it
- Evaluation of the degree of agreement in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy between ophthalmologists and EyeArtInternational journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- The efficacy of artificial intelligence in diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- Sharing reliable information worldwide: healthcare strategies based on artificial intelligence need external validation. Position paper.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Ocular biomarkers: useful incidental findings by deep learning algorithms in fundus photographs.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Assessing Diabetic Retinopathy Staging With AI: A Comparative Analysis Between Pseudocolor and LED Imaging.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Using Color Retinal Photographs: From Development to Deployment.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Review
- Cluster analysis of Thai patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus to predict disease progression and treatment outcomes : A prospective cohort study.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2022Article
- Deep Learning Models for Segmenting Non-perfusion Area of Color Fundus Photographs in Patients With Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the clinical performance of an automated diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening model to detect referable cases at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Methods: A retrospective review of two sets of fundus photographs (Eidon and Nidek) was undertaken. The images were classified by DR staging prior to the development of a DR screening model. In a prospective cross-sectional enrollment of patients with diabetes, automated detection of referable DR was compared with the results of the gold standard, a dilated fundus examination. Results: The study analyzed 2533 Nidek fundus images and 1989 Eidon images. The sensitivities calculated for the Nidek and Eidon images were 0.93 and 0.88 and the specificities were 0.91 and 0.85, respectively. In a clinical verification phase using 982 Nidek and 674 Eidon photographs, the calculated sensitivities and specificities were 0.86 and 0.92 for Nidek along with 0.92 and 0.84 for Eidon, respectively. The 60°-field images from the Eidon yielded a more desirable performance in differentiating referable DR than did the corresponding images from the Nidek. Conclusions: A conventional fundus examination requires intense healthcare resources. It is time consuming and possibly leads to unavoidable human errors. The deep learning algorithm for the detection of referable DR exhibited a favorable performance and is a promising alternative for DR screening. However, variations in the color and pixels of photographs can cause differences in sensitivity and specificity. The image angle and poor quality of fundus photographs were the main limitations of the automated method. Translational Relevance: The deep learning algorithm, developed from basic research of image processing, was applied to detect referable DR in a real-word clinical care setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.