Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34767337›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2021

Molecular Perturbation Effects in AFM-Based Tip-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy: Contact versus Tapping Mode.

Giovanni Luca Bartolomeo, Yao Zhang, Naresh Kumar, Renato Zenobi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanni Luca BartolomeoDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0720-4965
Yao ZhangHefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and Synergetic Innovation Center of Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, Anhui, China.
Naresh KumarDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8953-5420
Renato ZenobiDepartment of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zürich, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5211-4358
ETH Zurich · CHUniversity of Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS) is a powerful tool for nondestructive and label-free surface chemical characterization at nanometer length scales. However, despite being considered nondestructive, the interaction of the TERS probe used in the analysis can alter the molecular organization of the sample. In this study, we investigate the role of the atomic force microscopy (AFM) feedback (contact mode and tapping mode) on molecular perturbation in TERS analysis of soft samples using a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) of 2-chloro-4-nitrobenzene-1-thiol (Cl-NBT) as a test sample. Surprisingly, the tapping mode shows a consistently higher TERS signal resulting from a minimal perturbation of the Cl-NBT SAM compared to the contact mode. This study provides novel insights into the choice of the correct AFM-TERS operation mode for nanoscale chemical analysis of soft and delicate samples and is expected to expedite the growing application of TERS in this area.

Indexed as

Spectrum Analysis, RamanSulfhydryl CompoundsMicroscopy, Atomic ForceSulfhydryl Compounds

Identifiers

PMID34767337
PMCPMC8691690
OpenAlexW3212167627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.