Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34767242›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2022

Intradermal comparative cervical tuberculin test in the diagnosis of caprine tuberculosis.

Carlos Augusto Scacchetti de Almeida, Caio R Dos Santos, Nilson Roberti Benites, Ricardo S Jordão, Érica Chimara, Fernando José Benesi, Sergio S de Azevedo, Márcio Garcia Ribeiro, Sônia Regina Pinheiro

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Carlos Augusto Scacchetti de AlmeidaCoordination of Sustainable Rural Development, Secretariat of Agriculture and Supply of State of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. carlossalmeida@sp.gov.br.
Caio R Dos SantosAnimal Pathology Department, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of São Paulo-USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Nilson Roberti BenitesDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Ricardo S JordãoBiological Institute of São Paulo, Secretariat of Agriculture and Supply of State of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Érica ChimaraTuberculosis and Mycobacteriosies Laboratory, Adolfo Lutz Institute, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Fernando José BenesiDepartament of Clinics, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Sergio S de AzevedoVeterinary Medicine Academic Unit, Federal University of Campina Grande, UFCG, Paraíba, PB, Brazil.
Márcio Garcia RibeiroDepartment of Animal Production and Preventive Veterinary Medicine, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, São Paulo State University-UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
Sônia Regina PinheiroDepartment of Preventive Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, USP, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRFederal Institute of São Paulo · BRInstituto Adolfo Lutz · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversidade Federal de Campina Grande · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tuberculosis remains one of the most important infectious diseases with well-known zoonotic nature that affect humans, wildlife, and domestic animals, including goats. Nonetheless, no intradermal tuberculin test has been standardized for caprine diagnosis of tuberculosis. The present study investigated the intradermal comparative cervical tuberculin test (ICCTT) in the diagnosis of tuberculosis among 60 goats from farms with history of tuberculosis. The cutoff applied to goats was based on a study where goats had been experimentally infected with Mycobacterium bovis and Mycobacterium avium. Clinical examination, bacteriological culture, and histopathological staining were assessed to the diagnosis. Isolates compatible with mycobacteria were subjected for molecular diagnosis based on gyrB-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and PCR restriction-enzyme analysis (PRA) of hsp65 gene by BstEII and HaeIII, namely PRA-hsp65 assay. From all goats, 60% (n = 36/60), 3.3% (n = 2/60), and 36.7% (n = 22/60) showed positive, inconclusive, and negative reactions, respectively. Out of 36 goats with ICCTT positive, 75% (n = 27/36) had isolation of mycobacteria and were detected M. bovis by gyrB-RFLP. Molecular diagnosis and histopathological findings compatible with tuberculosis showed 86.1% (n = 31/36) concordance with the ICCTT. When compared ICCTT with M. bovis isolation, gyrB-RFLP, and histopathology, the better arithmetic means of sensitivity and specificity were 2.5 mm for ICCTT compared with M. bovis isolation and gyrB-RFLP, and 4.55 mm when compared with histopathology. Both receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves presented statistical significance (P < 0.001). The identification of other mycobacteria, e.g., M. kansasii, M. flavescens, M. avium, M. florentinum, M. lentiflavum, M. simiae, and Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis, not influenced positive results in ICCTT. The concordance between bacteriological, histopathological, and molecular identification with ICCTT findings indicate that the tuberculin test may be used as a valuable tool for diagnosis of caprine tuberculosis and reinforce the importance of association of methods to diagnostic of the disease from animal origin.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium bovisTuberculosisAnimalsGoatsTuberculinTuberculin TestTuberculinGoatsgyrB-RFLPMycobacterium bovisPRA-hsp65Tuberculin tests

Identifiers

PMID34767242
PMCPMC8882482
OpenAlexW3213812073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.