Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34767178›Full record

ReviewNeotropical entomology2021

The Gender Gap in Brazilian Entomology: an Analysis of the Academic Scenario.

Juliana Hipólito, Leila Teruko Shirai, Rosana Halinski, Aline Sartori Guidolin, Nivia da Silva Dias Pini, Carmen Sílvia Soares Pires, Ranyse Barbosa Querino, Eliane Dias Quintela, Eliana Maria Gouveia Fontes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neotropical entomology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Juliana HipólitoInstituto de Biologia, Univ Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, Brazil. jhdsousa@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0721-3143
Leila Teruko ShiraiInstituto de Biologia, Univ Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0914-2585
Rosana HalinskiEscola Politécnica, Pontifícia Univ Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2956-4240
Aline Sartori GuidolinEscola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Univ de São Paulo, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5521-9067
Nivia da Silva Dias PiniEmbrapa Agroindústria Tropical, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3664-812X
Carmen Sílvia Soares PiresEmbrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4019-022X
Ranyse Barbosa QuerinoEmbrapa Cerrados, Planaltina, DF, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1258-1821
Eliane Dias QuintelaEmbrapa Arroz e Feijão, Santo Antônio de Goiás, GO, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9412-4845
Eliana Maria Gouveia FontesEmbrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, Brasília, DF, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-4251

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although women are about half of world's population, they are underrepresented in many sectors including academia and the research scenario in general. Gender gap in Entomology has been pointed out in other publications; however, data for Brazil has never been demonstrated. Here we provide a diagnosis for the Brazilian Entomology scenario in order to contribute to propositions towards disentangling the gender gap in general. We analyzed scientometric data for Brazilian Entomology focusing on gender disparity and on personal perceptions related to the gender gap through an online questionnaire. We detected a pervasive gender bias in which the scissor-shaped curve is the most representative effect of it: women were the majority in lower degree stages but the minority in higher degree stages (permanent positions and positions of prestige and power). We also observed mentorship bias and discussed these results in light of intersectionality and the COVID-19 pandemic. Gender differences were perceived differently by the questionnaire respondents considering age, gender, and parenting. With this data and analyses, we have provided elements to stimulate and support change to a healthier and more equitable academic space.

Indexed as

COVID-19SexismAnimalsBrazilFemaleMalePandemicsSARS-CoV-2Sex FactorsInsectsLattesLeaky pipelineScissor effectSucupira

Identifiers

PMID34767178
PMCPMC8587496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.