ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2022
[Posterior YAG capsulotomy: selection of the application pattern].
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Conbercept reverses TGF-βNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University · 2024Article
- An energy efficiency assessment of Yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser in vitro.Lasers in medical science · 2024Article
- Micro-Computed Tomography (µCT) as a Tool for High-Resolution 3D Imaging and Analysis of Intraocular Lenses: Feasibility and Proof of the Methodology to Evaluate YAG Pits.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe posterior neodymium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser capsulotomy is an established and simple method with a low complication rate for the treatment of secondary cataracts; however, the risk of intraocular pressure elevation, pit marks of the intraocular lens (IOL), anterior hyaloid damage, cystoid macular edema and retinal detachment may increase with high pulse number, pulse energy, and total energy. PURPOSE: The optimization potential of the method through a rational choice of the laser pattern and the strategy, taking into account the mechanical properties of the posterior capsule and the anatomical features of the retrolental region, is shown. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe article provides a literature review with own clinical observations and a geometric representation.
resultsThe efficiency of a laser pattern is examined with a constant capsulotomy length: The largest opening can be reached with the U‑pattern, which is followed by the +, T, H, V, O and spiral patterns in decreasing order. When estimating the size of the opening, its incircle is of particular functional importance. If the ability of the posterior capsule to tear spontaneously, which is predetermined by its anatomical and mechanical properties, is taken into account when choosing the application pattern and the laser strategy, the efficiency of the method increases.
conclusionAn efficient technique is not only determined by an adapted defocusing and a minimum possible individual pulse energy setting but also characterized by the lowest possible total energy consumption if the necessary opening size is achieved by the smallest number of pulses. Taking into account the individual retrolental anatomical conditions and the mechanical properties of the NS membrane can contribute to the gentle implementation of a YAG capsulotomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.