Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34767073›Full record

ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2022

Biodegradation of waste cooking oil and simultaneous production of rhamnolipid biosurfactant by Pseudomonas aeruginosa P7815 in batch and fed-batch bioreactor.

Swati Sharma, Rahul Verma, Sahil Dhull, Soumen K Maiti, Lalit M Pandey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Swati SharmaBio-Interface and Environmental Engineering Lab, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.
Rahul VermaCentre for the Environment, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.
Sahil DhullIntegrated Bioprocessing Laboratory, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.
Soumen K MaitiIntegrated Bioprocessing Laboratory, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India.
Lalit M PandeyBio-Interface and Environmental Engineering Lab, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati, Assam, 781039, India. lalitpandey@iitg.ac.in.
Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati · IN

Funding

Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology SR/FST/LS-II/2017/120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biosurfactants are non-toxic, surface-active biomolecules capable of reducing surface tension (ST) and emulsifying interface at a comparably lower concentration than commercial surfactants. Yet, poor yield, costlier substrates, and complex cultivation processes limit their commercial applications. This study focuses on producing biosurfactants by Pseudomonas aeruginosa P7815 in batch and fed-batch bioreactor systems using waste cooking oil (WCO) as the sole carbon source. The batch study showed a 92% of WCO biodegradation ability of P. aeruginosa producing 11 g L

Indexed as

Escherichia coliPseudomonas aeruginosaBiodegradation, EnvironmentalBioreactorsCookingGlycolipidsSurface-Active AgentsGlycolipidsrhamnolipidSurface-Active AgentsAntibacterialBiosurfactantsFed-batch bioreactorSurface tensionWaste cooking oil

Identifiers

PMID34767073
OpenAlexW3213497254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.