Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34766914›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2021

Population Health Surveillance Using Mobile Phone Surveys in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Methodology and Sample Representativeness of a Cross-sectional Survey of Live Poultry Exposure in Bangladesh.

Isha Berry, Punam Mangtani, Mahbubur Rahman, Iqbal Ansary Khan, Sudipta Sarkar, Tanzila Naureen, Amy L Greer, Shaun K Morris, David N Fisman, Meerjady Sabrina Flora

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Isha BerryDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3138-664X
Punam MangtaniLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-7074-2999
Mahbubur RahmanInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-8577-8281
Iqbal Ansary KhanInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-1262-9987
Sudipta SarkarInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-8216-9082
Tanzila NaureenInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0002-2512-5446
Amy L GreerDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6366-0458
Shaun K MorrisDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9809-0822
David N FismanDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5009-6926
Meerjady Sabrina FloraInstitute of Epidemiology, Disease Control and Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID 0000-0001-5172-1295

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation-based health surveys are typically conducted using face-to-face household interviews in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, telephone-based surveys are cheaper, faster, and can provide greater access to hard-to-reach or remote populations. The rapid growth in mobile phone ownership in LMICs provides a unique opportunity to implement novel data collection methods for population health surveys.

objectiveThis study aims to describe the development and population representativeness of a mobile phone survey measuring live poultry exposure in urban Bangladesh.

methodsA population-based, cross-sectional, mobile phone survey was conducted between September and November 2019 in North and South Dhaka City Corporations (DCC), Bangladesh, to measure live poultry exposure using a stratified probability sampling design. Data were collected using a computer-assisted telephone interview platform. The call operational data were summarized, and the participant data were weighted by age, sex, and education to the 2011 census. The demographic distribution of the weighted sample was compared with external sources to assess population representativeness.

resultsA total of 5486 unique mobile phone numbers were dialed, with 1047 respondents completing the survey. The survey had an overall response rate of 52.2% (1047/2006) and a co-operation rate of 89.0% (1047/1176). Initial results comparing the sociodemographic profile of the survey sample to the census population showed that mobile phone sampling slightly underrepresented older individuals and overrepresented those with higher secondary education. After weighting, the demographic profile of the sample population matched well with the latest DCC census population profile.

conclusionsProbability-based mobile phone survey sampling and data collection methods produced a population-representative sample with minimal adjustment in DCC, Bangladesh. Mobile phone-based surveys can offer an efficient, economic, and robust way to conduct surveillance for population health outcomes, which has important implications for improving population health surveillance in LMICs.

Indexed as

Cell PhonePopulation HealthAnimalsBangladeshCross-Sectional StudiesDeveloping CountriesHumansPoultrySurveys and QuestionnairesBangladeshhealth surveillancemobile telephone surveysurvey methodology

Identifiers

PMID34766914
PMCPMC8663489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.