Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34766909›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2021

Dropout From an Internet-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Intervention for Adults With Depression and Anxiety: Qualitative Study.

Kate Lawler, Caroline Earley, Ladislav Timulak, Angel Enrique, Derek Richards

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07113548 (PERSONAE), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07113548 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

PERSONAE: a Personalized Adaptation of Stepped Care Internet-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression - A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRegion of Southern DenmarkRan2025 to 2027Enrolled175ConditionsDepression - Major Depressive DisorderArmsPersonalized iCBT for depression, Standard iCBT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kate LawlerE-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6459-9831
Caroline EarleyE-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5303-0893
Ladislav TimulakE-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2785-0753
Angel EnriqueE-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0585-4008
Derek RichardsE-Mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0871-4078
Trinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTreatment dropout continues to be reported from internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) interventions, and lower completion rates are generally associated with lower treatment effect sizes. However, evidence is emerging to suggest that completion of a predefined number of modules is not always necessary for clinical benefit or consideration of the needs of each individual patient.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to perform a qualitative analysis of patients' experiences with an iCBT intervention in a routine care setting to achieve a deeper insight into the phenomenon of dropout.

methodsA total of 15 purposively sampled participants (female: 8/15, 53%) from a larger parent randomized controlled trial were interviewed via telephone using a semistructured interview schedule that was developed based on the existing literature and research on dropout in iCBT. Data were analyzed using a descriptive-interpretive approach.

resultsThe experience of treatment leading to dropout can be understood in terms of 10 domains: relationship to technology, motivation to start, background knowledge and attitudes toward iCBT, perceived change in motivation, usage of the program, changes due to the intervention, engagement with content, experience interacting with the supporter, experience of web-based communication, and termination of the supported period.

conclusionsPatients who drop out of treatment can be distinguished in terms of their change in motivation: those who felt ready to leave treatment early and those who had negative reasons for dropping out. These 2 groups of participants have different treatment experiences, revealing the potential attributes and nonattributes of dropout. The reported between-group differences should be examined further to consider those attributes that are strongly descriptive of the experience and regarded less important than those that have become loosely affiliated.

Indexed as

anxietydepressiondropoutiCBTinternet interventions

Identifiers

PMID34766909
PMCPMC8663602
OpenAlexW3190498092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.