ArticleRadiology. Imaging cancer2021
Malignancy Upgrade Rates of Radial Sclerosing Lesions at Breast Cancer Screening.
Article in Radiology. Imaging cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Management of Radial Scars and Complex Sclerosing Lesions of the Breast: To Excise or Not to Excise?World journal of surgery · 2026Article
- A Chain-of-thought Reasoning Breast Ultrasound Dataset Covering All Histopathology Categories.Scientific data · 2026Article
- High-Risk Breast Lesions on Core Biopsy: Rates of Upgrade and Management Recommendations.Surgical pathology clinics · 2025Review
- Approach to Architectural Distortion on Digital Mammography-A Prospective Study from Tertiary Care Cancer Center.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Navigating the Uncertainty of B3 Breast Lesions: Diagnostic Challenges and Evolving Management Strategies.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Radial sclerosing lesions found on core needle biopsy: excision can be safely avoided.Histopathology · 2024Article
- Third International Consensus Conference on lesions of uncertain malignant potential in the breast (B3 lesions).Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2023Review
- [Interpretation of Image-Guided Biopsy Results and Assessment].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2023Review
- An ultrasound-based radiomics model to distinguish between sclerosing adenosis and invasive ductal carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- A comparative study on the features of breast sclerosing adenosis and invasive ductal carcinoma via ultrasound and establishment of a predictive nomogram.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose To determine the upgrade rate for biopsy-proven radial scars and radial sclerosing lesions (RS). Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, radiology and pathology databases from two tertiary breast centers were searched to identify patients with biopsy-confirmed RS between March 1, 2012, and December 31, 2017, during which all mammography was performed with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Adjunct modalities such as MRI or US are performed at our centers to better characterize lesions identified at DBT. Patient demographics, imaging, needle and excisional biopsies, and follow-up data were collected at the patient level. Clopper-Pearson interval estimate for upgrade was calculated for 95% confidence using PropCIs package with R version 4.1.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing) (1). Results During the study period, a total of 155 885 DBT examinations were performed. From these examinations, 146 biopsy-proven RS were identified in 142 women (median age, 58 years; age range, 26-87 years). A total of 80.1% (117 of 146) of all RS did not have associated atypia or malignancy, and 19.9% (29 of 146) had associated atypia at initial biopsy. A total of 66.7% (78 of 117) of RS without atypia or malignancy were surgically excised, 25.6% (30 of 117) were followed (median, 3 years; range, 1-7 years) with benign findings on imaging, and 7.7% (nine of 117) were lost to follow-up. The rate of malignancy upgrade was 0.9% (one of 117 [95% CI: 0.02, 4.7]); one RS without concurrent atypia or malignancy demonstrated invasive carcinoma at surgical excision. Conclusion RS without atypia had a low upgrade rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.