Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34766317›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2022

Applications of CPPs in Genome Editing of Plants.

Atta Soliman, John Laurie, Andriy Bilichak, Alicja Ziemienowicz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Atta SolimanLethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
John LaurieLethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada.
Andriy BilichakMorden Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Morden, MB, Canada.
Alicja ZiemienowiczLethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB, Canada. alicja.ziemienowicz@agr.gc.ca.
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell penetrating peptides (CPPs) are short peptides that are able to translocate themselves and their cargo into cells. The progressive and continuous application of CPPs in various fields of basic and applied research shows that they are efficient delivery vectors for an assortment of biomolecules, including nucleic acids and proteins. This feature makes CPPs an excellent tool for modification of plant genomes through transgenesis and genome editing. In this review, we present the progress during the last three decades in application of CPPs for delivery of DNA, RNA, and proteins into plant cells and tissues. Moreover, we highlight the exploiting of CPPs as advantageous and beneficial tool for plant genome editing via delivery of nuclease proteins, and provide a practical example of genome alternation through CPP-delivered nucleases. Finally, the current exploitation of peptides in organelle-specific DNA delivery and modification of organellar genomes is discussed.

Indexed as

Gene EditingCell-Penetrating PeptidesDNAEndonucleasesGene Transfer TechniquesNucleic AcidsPlantsProteinsCell-Penetrating PeptidesDNAEndonucleasesNucleic AcidsProteinsCell penetrating peptidesDNA deliveryGenome editingMicrosporesNucleasesPlant cellsProtein transductionRNA deliverysiRNAZinc finger nuclease (ZFN)

Identifiers

PMID34766317
OpenAlexW3214439978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.