Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34766278›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2022

Evaluation and comparison of cytotoxicity and bioactivity of chemomechanical caries removal agents on stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth.

V Maru, M Madkaikar, S Shabrish, P Kambli, A Dalvi, P Setia

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V MaruDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Government Dental College and Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. viralmaru@yahoo.co.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5649-1780
M MadkaikarICMR -National Institute of Immunohematology, Parel, Mumbai, India.
S ShabrishICMR -National Institute of Immunohematology, Parel, Mumbai, India.
P KambliICMR -National Institute of Immunohematology, Parel, Mumbai, India.
A DalviICMR -National Institute of Immunohematology, Parel, Mumbai, India.
P SetiaICMR -National Institute of Immunohematology, Parel, Mumbai, India.
ICMR - National Institute of Immunohaemotology · INGovernment Dental College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo investigate and compare the cytotoxicity and bioactivity of CMCR agents on stem cells derived from exfoliated deciduous teeth. METHODOLOGY: MTT assay, flow cytometry, Alizarin Red staining and scratch assay were used to assess the cellular viability, apoptosis, calcium matrix deposits and cell migration, respectively. The gene expression of ALP and BMP-2 was measured with RT-PCR. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni post-test was used for statistical analysis.

results0.5% Carisolv showed highest cell proliferation and calcium matrix formation, whereas 0.5% Papacarie reported the highest% live cells and cell migration. The highest mRNA expression of ALP and BMP-2 was reported in SHEDs cultured in 0.5% Papacarie (after 72 h incubation) and 0.5% Carisolv (after 24 h incubation), respectively.

conclusionCMCR agents are biocompatible and bioactive when cultured in stem cells derived from exfoliated primary teeth.

Indexed as

CalciumTooth, DeciduousCell ProliferationCells, CulturedDental Caries SusceptibilityHumansStem CellsCalciumBioactivityCarisolvCytotoxicityPapacarieSHED

Identifiers

PMID34766278
OpenAlexW3211410830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.