ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2022
Paediatric enteric fever in Brussels: a case series over 16 years.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Epidemiological characteristics and trends of notified enteric fevers in Germany, 2001 to 2023.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2025Article
- Spatial heterogeneity of socio-economic determinants of typhoid/paratyphoid fever in one province in central China from 2015 to 2019.BMC public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Enteric fever (EF) is a major public health problem and a witness of the global health disparities. It is caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (Salmonella ser. Typhi) and Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi A, B, C (Salmonella ser. Paratyphi) and is estimated to infect 12-26 million persons yearly. Paediatric data on enteric fever in Europe are scarce. A case series of EF was analysed to describe the clinical presentation, laboratory characteristics and diagnostic challenges identified in a paediatric population in Brussels. We performed a retrospective study of all lab-confirmed cases of enteric fever in children aged 0-15 years at two Brussels teaching hospitals, between January 2005 and December 2020. We reviewed age, gender, travel history, consultations before diagnosis, hospitalisation duration, clinical symptoms and laboratory findings. There were 34 positive isolates of S. typhi and S. paratyphi: 31 patients had positive blood culture, 1 patient had positive bone aspirate and 2 patients had positive stool culture (one was excluded for missing data). There were 20 girls (60%). Median age was 3.5 years (range 5 months to 14 years). Travel to EF endemic areas was present in 55% of patients. Diagnosis was delayed in 80% of children. Eosinopenia was present in 93% of the cohort. The patients had not received any preventive travel education or vaccination. Conlusion: Enteric fever poses diagnostic challenges to clinicians. Eosinopenia in a febrile patient coming from the tropics should raise suspicion of EF. Travellers to endemic areas should be better educated about EF risks, and typhoid fever vaccination must be promoted. What is Known: • Enteric fever is a global public health problem and includes typhoid and paratyphoid fever. • Typhoid fever is vaccine preventable disease. Paratyphoid fever is not vaccine preventable. What is New: • Enteric fever diagnosis is very challenging in non-endemic settings, and a large proportion of patients may develop serious complications if they receive delayed management. Occurrence of small family clusters is possible and mandates education and monitoring of the families of enteric fever affected children. • We report that the widest majority of our enteric fever affected patients (69%) had aneosinophilia (zero eosinophil count), and almost all patients (93%) had eosinopaenia (less than 50 eosinophil count) during their bacteriaemic phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.