Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34766187›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2022

Mental distress among young adults in Great Britain: long-term trends and early changes during the COVID-19 pandemic.

T Gagné, I Schoon, A McMunn, A Sacker

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 2: changes in primary care clinical activity in England during the COVID-19 pandemic.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T GagnéInternational Centre for Lifecourse Studies in Society and Health, London, UK. t.gagne@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4753-1653
I SchoonSocial Research Institute, UCL, London, UK.
A McMunnInternational Centre for Lifecourse Studies in Society and Health, London, UK.
A SackerInternational Centre for Lifecourse Studies in Society and Health, London, UK.
Centre for Life · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/R008930/1Economic and Social Research Council ES/V01577X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn Great Britain, few studies documented mental health trends in young adults in the years preceding 2020, the mental health dimensions affected, and how these compare with changes observed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsLong-term trends in mental health among 16-34 year old men and women between 1991 and 2018, and changes between 2018-19 and July-September 2020 were examined using all waves from the British Household Panel Study (1991-2008), the UK Household Longitudinal Study (2009-20), and the first five UKHLS COVID-19 waves administered in April, May, June, July, and September 2020. Findings are based on the GHQ-12 continuous score (0-36), clinically significant cases (4 + /12) and severe cases (7 + /12) for mental distress, and item endorsements.

resultsBetween 1991 and 2018, the prevalence of cases (4 + /12) increased from 14-22% to 19-32% across groups. Increases were largest in women aged 16-24. In April 2020, the risk of caseness (4 + /12) increased across groups by 55% to 80% compared to the 2018-19 baseline. This increase, however, rapidly diminished over time: in July-September 2020, there was only a higher risk of caseness (4 + /12) in men aged 25-34 (prevalence ratio = 1.29, 95% CI 1.01-1.65) compared to the 2018-19 baseline.

conclusionWhereas distress surged in April 2020, its return to pre-pandemic levels by September 2020 highlights the nuanced impact that the pandemic may have over time. Given the magnitude of the decline in mental health over the past decade, attention must be given to young adults once the pandemic ends.

Indexed as

COVID-19Mental DisordersAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMalePandemicsUnited KingdomYoung AdultGeneral health questionnairePsychological distressTime trendsUnited KingdomYoung adults

Identifiers

PMID34766187
PMCPMC8583581
OpenAlexW3212612412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.