Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34766107›Full record

ReviewMedComm2020

Zeolite in tissue engineering: Opportunities and challenges.

Payam Zarrintaj, Ghader Mahmodi, Saeed Manouchehri, Amin Hamed Mashhadzadeh, Mohsen Khodadadi, Morteza Servatan, Mohammad Reza Ganjali, Bruno Azambre, Seok-Jhin Kim, Josh D Ramsey and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MedComm, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Zeolites: A series of promising biomaterials in bone tissue engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Payam ZarrintajSchool of Chemical Engineering Oklahoma State University 420 Engineering North Stillwater OK USA.
Ghader MahmodiSchool of Chemical Engineering Oklahoma State University 420 Engineering North Stillwater OK USA.
Saeed ManouchehriSchool of Chemical Engineering Oklahoma State University 420 Engineering North Stillwater OK USA.
Amin Hamed MashhadzadehCenter of Excellence in Electrochemistry School of Chemistry, College of Science, University of Tehran Tehran Iran.
Mohsen KhodadadiCenter of Excellence in Electrochemistry School of Chemistry, College of Science, University of Tehran Tehran Iran.
Morteza ServatanPolymer Engineering Department Faculty of Engineering, Urmia University Urmia Iran.
Mohammad Reza GanjaliCenter of Excellence in Electrochemistry School of Chemistry, College of Science, University of Tehran Tehran Iran.
Bruno AzambreUniversité de Lorraine Laboratoire de Chimie et Physique-Approche Multi-Echelle des Milieux Complexes (LCP-A2MC- EA n°4362) Institut Jean-Barriol FR2843 CNRS Rue Victor Demange Saint-Avold 57500 France.
Seok-Jhin KimSchool of Chemical Engineering Oklahoma State University 420 Engineering North Stillwater OK USA.
Josh D RamseySchool of Chemical Engineering Oklahoma State University 420 Engineering North Stillwater OK USA.
Sajjad HabibzadehDepartment of Chemical Engineering Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic) Tehran Iran.
Mohammad Reza SaebDepartment of Resin and Additive Institute for Color Science and Technology Tehran Iran.
Masoud MozafariDepartment of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine Iran University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0232-352X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine follow a multidisciplinary attitude to the expansion and application of new materials for the treatment of different tissue defects. Typically, proper tissue regeneration is accomplished through concurrent biocompatibility and positive cellular activity. This can be resulted by the smart selection of platforms among bewildering arrays of structural possibilities with various porosity properties (ie, pore size, pore connectivity, etc). Among diverse porous structures, zeolite is known as a microporous tectosilicate that can potentially provide a biological microenvironment in tissue engineering applications. In addition, zeolite has been particularly appeared promising in wound dressing and bone- and tooth-oriented scaffolds. The wide range of composition and hierarchical pore structure renders the zeolitic materials a unique character, particularly, for tissue engineering purposes. Despite such unique features, research on zeolitic platforms for tissue engineering has not been classically presented. In this review, we overview, classify, and categorize zeolitic platforms employed in biological and tissue engineering applications.

Indexed as

biomaterialsporous materialsregenerative medicinetissue engineeringzeolite

Identifiers

PMID34766107
PMCPMC8489670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.