Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34766101›Full record

ArticleThe lancet. Healthy longevity2021

Urinary peptidomic profiles to address age-related disabilities: a prospective population study.

Dries S Martens, Lutgarde Thijs, Agnieszka Latosinska, Sander Trenson, Justyna Siwy, Zhen-Yu Zhang, Congrong Wang, Joachim Beige, Antonia Vlahou, Stefan Janssens and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The lancet. Healthy longevity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Peptidome Profiling ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Dries S MartensCentre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Lutgarde ThijsResearch Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, KU Leuven Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Agnieszka LatosinskaMosaiques-Diagnostics, Hannover, Germany.
Sander TrensonDivision of Cardiology, Sint-Jan Hospital, Bruges, Belgium.
Justyna SiwyMosaiques-Diagnostics, Hannover, Germany.
Zhen-Yu ZhangResearch Unit Hypertension and Cardiovascular Epidemiology, KU Leuven Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Congrong WangCentre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Joachim BeigeMartin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Antonia VlahouSystems Biology Center, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Stefan JanssensDivision of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Harald MischakMosaiques-Diagnostics, Hannover, Germany.
Tim S NawrotCentre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Jan A StaessenBiomedical Sciences Group, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
FLEMENGHO investigators
KU Leuven · BEMosaiques Diagnostics and Therapeutics (Germany) · DEHasselt University · BEAcademy of Athens · GRAZ Sint-Jan · BEMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DE

Funding

South Texas Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP30AG066546 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Claudia Kimie Suemoto · 2021 to 2026
$24.0M
Integration of Socio-Spatial Data for Neighborhoods with Multi-omic profiles to Identify and Mitigate Factors Affecting Risk of ALzheimer's DiseaseDP1AG069870 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS RIO GRANDE VALLEY · PI MAESTRE, GLADYS E. · 2020 to 2024
$3.6M
NIA NIH HHS DP1 AG069870NIA NIH HHS P30 AG066546
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2019 called for innovation in addressing age-related disabilities. Our study aimed to identify and validate a urinary peptidomic profile (UPP) differentiating healthy from unhealthy ageing in the general population, to test the UPP predictor in independent patient cohorts, and to search for targetable molecular pathways underlying age-related chronic diseases.

methodsIn this prospective population study, we used data from participants in the Flemish Study on Environment, Genes and Health Outcomes (FLEMENGHO), done in northern Belgium from 1985 to 2019, and invited participants to a follow-up examination in 2005-10. Participants were eligible if their address was within 15 km of the examination centre and if they had not withdrawn consent in any of the previous examination cycles (1985-2004). All participants (2005-10) were also invited to an additional follow-up examination in 2009-13. Participants who took part in both the 2005-10 follow-up examination and in the additional 2009-13 follow-up visit constituted the derivation dataset, which included their 2005-10 data, and the time-shifted internal validation dataset, which included their 2009-13 data. The remaining participants who only had 2005-10 data constituted the synchronous internal validation dataset. Participants were excluded from analyses if they were incapacitated, had not undergone UPP, or had either missing or outlying (three SDs greater than the mean of all consenting participants) values of body-mass index, plasma glucose, or serum creatinine. The UPP was assessed by capillary electrophoresis coupled with mass spectrometry. The multidimensional UPP signature reflecting ageing was generated from the derivation dataset and validated in the time-shifted internal validation dataset and the synchronous validation dataset. It was further validated in patients with diabetes, COVID-19, or chronic kidney disease (CKD). In FLEMENGHO, the mortality endpoints were all-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular mortality; other endpoints were fatal or non-fatal cancer and musculoskeletal disorders. Molecular pathway exploration was done using the Reactome and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes databases.

findings778 individuals (395 [51%] women and 383 [49%] men; aged 16·2-82·1 years; mean age 50·9 years [SD 15·8]) from the FLEMENGHO cohort had a follow-up examination between 2005 and 2010, of whom 559 participants had a further follow-up from Oct 28, 2009, to March 19, 2013, and made up the derivation (2005-10) and time-shifted internal validation (2009-13) datasets. 219 were examined once and constituted the synchronous internal validation dataset (2005-10). With correction for multiple testing and multivariable adjustment, chronological age was associated with 210 sequenced peptides mainly showing downregulation of collagen fragments. The trained model relating chronological age to UPP, derived by elastic net regression, included 54 peptides from 17 proteins. The UPP-age prediction model explained 76·3% (

interpretationThe UPP signature indicative of ageing reflects fibrosis and extracellular matrix remodelling and was associated with risk factors and adverse health outcomes in the population and with accelerated ageing in patients. Innovation in addressing disability should shift focus from the ontology of diseases to shared disease mechanisms, in particular ageing-related fibrotic degeneration.

fundingEuropean Research Council, Ministry of the Flemish Community, OMRON Healthcare.

Indexed as

COVID-19OsteoporosisRenal Insufficiency, ChronicCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID34766101
PMCPMC8566278
OpenAlexW3204997864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.