ArticleCritical care explorations2021
Queensland Pediatric Sepsis Breakthrough Collaborative: Multicenter Observational Study to Evaluate the Implementation of a Pediatric Sepsis Pathway Within the Emergency Department.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early recognition and bundle-based management of pediatric sepsis in the emergency department: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2026Review
- Clinical Outcomes for Emergency Department Presentations of Sepsis Managed on a Clinical Pathway: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Comparison of Random Forest and Stepwise Regression for Variable Selection Using Low Prevalence Predictors: A case Study in Paediatric Sepsis.Maternal and child health journal · 2025Article
- Impact of an evidence-based sepsis pathway on paediatric hospital clinical practice: A quality improvement study.Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA · 2025Article
- Identification of distinct clinical profiles of sepsis risk in paediatric emergency department patients using Bayesian profile regression.BMJ paediatrics open · 2025Article
- "You're listening but you're not hearing": qualitative exploration of parents' lived experience of paediatric sepsis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- Digital solutions in paediatric sepsis: current state, challenges, and opportunities to improve care around the world.The Lancet. Digital health · 2024Review
- Article
- Impact of parental and healthcare professional concern on the diagnosis of pediatric sepsis: a diagnostic accuracy study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2023Article
- Impact of an electronic alert system for pediatric sepsis screening a tertiary hospital experience.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Patient and economic impact of implementing a paediatric sepsis pathway in emergency departments in Queensland, Australia.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the implementation of a pediatric sepsis pathway in the emergency department as part of a statewide quality improvement initiative in Queensland, Australia.
designMulticenter observational prospective cohort study.
settingTwelve emergency departments in Queensland, Australia. PATIENTS: Children less than 18 years evaluated for sepsis in the emergency department. Patients with signs of shock, nonshocked patients with signs of organ dysfunction, and patients without organ dysfunction were assessed.
interventionsIntroduction of a pediatric sepsis pathway. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsProcess measures included compliance with and timeliness of the sepsis bundle, and bundle components. Process and outcome measures of children admitted to the ICU with sepsis were compared with a baseline cohort. Five-hundred twenty-three children were treated for sepsis including 291 with suspected sepsis without organ dysfunction, 86 with sepsis-associated organ dysfunction, and 146 with septic shock. Twenty-four (5%) were admitted to ICU, and three (1%) died. The median time from sepsis recognition to bundle commencement for children with septic shock was 56 minutes (interquartile range, 36-99 min) and 47 minutes (interquartile range, 34-76 min) for children with sepsis-associated organ dysfunction without shock; 30% (
conclusionsOur findings on the introduction of protocolized care in a large and diverse state demonstrate ongoing variability in sepsis bundle compliance. Although bundle compliance improved compared with a baseline cohort, continued efforts are required to ensure guideline targets and sustainability are achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.