Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34765981›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2021

Queensland Pediatric Sepsis Breakthrough Collaborative: Multicenter Observational Study to Evaluate the Implementation of a Pediatric Sepsis Pathway Within the Emergency Department.

Amanda Harley, Paula Lister, Patricia Gilholm, Michael Rice, Bala Venkatesh, Amy N B Johnston, Debbie Massey, Adam Irwin, Kristen Gibbons, Luregn J Schlapbach

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Amanda HarleySchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Paula ListerChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Patricia GilholmChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Michael RiceClinical Excellence Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Bala VenkateshThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Amy N B JohnstonSchool of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Debbie MasseySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia.
Adam IrwinUQ Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Kristen GibbonsChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Luregn J SchlapbachChild Health Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUGold Coast Hospital · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AUThe George Institute for Global Health · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the implementation of a pediatric sepsis pathway in the emergency department as part of a statewide quality improvement initiative in Queensland, Australia.

designMulticenter observational prospective cohort study.

settingTwelve emergency departments in Queensland, Australia. PATIENTS: Children less than 18 years evaluated for sepsis in the emergency department. Patients with signs of shock, nonshocked patients with signs of organ dysfunction, and patients without organ dysfunction were assessed.

interventionsIntroduction of a pediatric sepsis pathway. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsProcess measures included compliance with and timeliness of the sepsis bundle, and bundle components. Process and outcome measures of children admitted to the ICU with sepsis were compared with a baseline cohort. Five-hundred twenty-three children were treated for sepsis including 291 with suspected sepsis without organ dysfunction, 86 with sepsis-associated organ dysfunction, and 146 with septic shock. Twenty-four (5%) were admitted to ICU, and three (1%) died. The median time from sepsis recognition to bundle commencement for children with septic shock was 56 minutes (interquartile range, 36-99 min) and 47 minutes (interquartile range, 34-76 min) for children with sepsis-associated organ dysfunction without shock; 30% (

conclusionsOur findings on the introduction of protocolized care in a large and diverse state demonstrate ongoing variability in sepsis bundle compliance. Although bundle compliance improved compared with a baseline cohort, continued efforts are required to ensure guideline targets and sustainability are achieved.

Indexed as

childcritical caremanagementpathwayrecognitionseptic shock

Identifiers

PMID34765981
PMCPMC8577679
OpenAlexW3213982935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.